User talk:Tarunq

Welcome!

Hello, Tarunq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Radhe Shyam did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. BOVINEBOY2008 13:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cinema of India. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. DO not remove sourced content. DO not add or rearrange sections in History and lead as per your own preferences. Discuss in talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making disruptive edit at Cinema of India. Do not all those info in the history section without source(s). DO not add those unnecessary "-woods" suffixed names when the articles have the format XYZ cinema where XYZ is the language. Note that these are also the WP:COMMONNAMEs of the articles. If you want to add info on Baahubali series in the history section, add with source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Number format

Please stop changing number formats from the correct one, to an incorrect one. We use 3 digits between commas, as WP:DIGITS not the South Asian numbering system as explained at MOS:NUMERAL - Arjayay (talk) 12:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at L. V. Revanth, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajahmundry. - Arjayay (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Aha (streaming service)

added links pointing to English and Telugu

South Indian International Movie Awards

added a link pointing to Tollywood

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits

Tollywood

Hello mate, I see that you on a roll replacing Telugu with Tollywood everywhere. This is problematic because an average reader would not know what Tollywood means. Even if they did, it is ambiguous as there are two Tollywoods, the other being Bengali cinema. The edits are also contrary to the common name Telugu cinema.

Minor edits

This one baffles me, you are marking edits with 4000+ bytes as minor. This is grossly misleading. Please go through WP:MINOR. It is meant for typos, fixing formatting errors, etc. Content addition can never be a minor edit.

While your contributions are welcome, they have to be in compliance with the community guidelines. If these edits continue, I have no option but to bring this to administrator's attention. I hope you rectify them and such a situation does not arise. Regards --Ab207 (talk) 19:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Extra Jabardasth

added a link pointing to Jabardasth

Puran poli

added a link pointing to Telugu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nishabdham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Do not remove Tamil without explaination. If you think you have a valid reason to do so, please discuss it at the talk page. Ab207 (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to draft

I moved your new page to Draft:List of highest-grossing South Indian Films as it requires more work prior to be placed in main space.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 14:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Gaioa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of highest-grossing non-English films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaioa (T C L) 09:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of highest-grossing Telugu films. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SIIMA Award for Best Film (Telugu), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gabbar Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Butta Bomma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Butta Bomma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Northern Escapee (talk) 13:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Durgavati (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Deleting a language of the film is not constructive and it is not clear why you have edited it in such a way. Please explain your edits in the edit summary. BOVINEBOY2008 15:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Durgavati (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 15:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Priyanka Jawalkar (actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Priyanka Jawalkar (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Jawalkar (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 14:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bigg Boss 4 Buzzz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bigg Boss 4 Buzzz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss 4 Buzzz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 1292simon (talk) 06:58, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maa Vintha Gadha Vinuma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maa Vintha Gadha Vinuma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maa Vintha Gadha Vinuma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaanu (2020 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thambi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Jam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sam Jam, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Amkgp 💬 06:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI check

Hello. Do you have any links with media companies, such as Aha (streaming service)? Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 23:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still editing

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tarunq. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tarunq|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. 1292simon (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK

Please don't add duplicate wikilinks as you've done here. Wikilinks compete for a reader's attention, and having an overabundance of links doesn't help. See WP:OVERLINK.

Additionally, when other editors notify you of various things or try to communicate with you, it's generally considered good form to respond, since this is a community project. I'm not talking about my comments here, I'm specifically talking about the query above where another editor has asked you about a potential conflict of interest. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Telugu films of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anjali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paritala Nirupam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paritala Nirupam, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhaagamathie. Do not change financial figures, and stop this Telugu POV of yours. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Poor references

Please don't add poor references as you did here when you used iqlikmovies.com as a source. We don't care what blogs or other faceless websites think or say. Anyone can start a website and publish whatever they want. Please stick to mainstream reliable sources known for fact-checking and accuracy. See WP:ICTFSOURCES if you aren't sure what those look like. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sarkaru Vaari Paata

Hey mate, your work on Sarkaru Vaari Paata is appreciated but as per WP:NFF, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." So the article can go live only after Jan 2021, when filming "has" started. Until then relevant info, if any, may be included in Parasuram (director). Thanks. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Naarappa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not add categories that are not supported by the article. If a film does not have a confirmed release year, you CANNOT add a category indicating when it is going to be released. BOVINEBOY2008 11:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gurthunda Seethakalam. After just coming off a block for unsourced editing, you continue to do so. You need to make a change to your editing habits or you may find yourself blocked again. BOVINEBOY2008 12:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jathi Ratnalu, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not add year specific categories like Category:2020s Telugu-language films to articles that do not currently have a sourced release. Please wait until the release year has been confirmed. BOVINEBOY2008 10:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coolie No. 1

Govinda's Coolie No. 1 is NOT remade from a Telugu film, but Tamil. Check this: https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/remake-of-coolie-no-1-a-new-film-david-dhawan/1567078 --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of most expensive Indian films, you may be blocked from editing. Stop POV pushing Telugu like you did here. Those are consensus versions. DO not change them. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unreliable sources

In edits such as these to Colour Photo, you've added numerous non WP:RS sources like Teluguin, Tollywood, Gulte, Cinejosh, Pehalnews, Kulfibuzz, Trendraja, Teluguhungama etc. Please be aware these sources are junk which serve no purpose whatsoever, see WP:ICTFSOURCES for what's acceptable. Looks like they were just being added randomly in the prose for no apparent reason. Also, it helps to use edit summaries to explain why you added these. Hope you keep that in mind. Regards -- Ab207 (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours to prevent further vandalism. This block is specifically for this edit, where you inflated the gross figure in conflict with this source. I will also note that another editor is concerned that you might be engaging in ethnic warring by promoting a Telugu agenda. If I or another administrator determines that to be the case, your next block will be for far longer. That sort of thing has no place at Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Good article nominations edits

Tarunq, please do not edit the nominations page directly. The entries are all generated by a bot, and it runs every 20 minutes, rewriting the page whenever there are changes. There is never any need for you to make edits to this page. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Filmfare Awards South

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.filmfare.com/news/bollywood/amazon-prime-video-wins-big-at-the-flyx-filmfare-ott-awards-45496-1.html, which is not released under a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. You may have copied the material from Filmfare Awards, where I have also had to remove it. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SIIMA Award for Best Actor - Telugu

Template:SIIMA Award for Best Actor - Telugu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ab207 (talk) 13:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards South for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards South is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards South until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards South has been nominated for deletion

Category:Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards South has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kaala Bhairava albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Kaala Bhairava albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Telugu films of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COMMONNAME

Tarunq, refrain from adding Tollywood, Kollywood, etc. Maintain WP:COMMONNAME, that is Telugu cinema, Tamil cinema, etc. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits, specifically here where you again seem to have trouble identifying adequate sources. "Sacnilk", a faceless blog, doesn't qualify. I encourage you to take the week to read WP:RS and WP:ICTFSOURCES as you were previously instructed. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Telugu films of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sai Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic content

Hello, In this edit. You added that Doody mistakenly posted the release date which was later confirmed as official. While it more or less falls under WP:RUMOUR, the issue, however, is that the source you added clearly says that rumoured date is 8 October, you instead wrote it as 13 October. In the next line, its written as if Doody's claim was later cofirmed as the actual date but none of the sources even made a passing mention of it. This is WP:SYNTH and should be avoided.

Also see WP:CITEKILL, you do not need to add multiple references for uncontroversial info like release dates, one is more than enought. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding poorly sourced content, most recently here, where you still seem to be having trouble understanding what a quality source looks like. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but first, read WP:RS and WP:ICTFSOURCES.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films shot in Konaseema has been nominated for merging

Category:Films shot in Konaseema has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 07:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Indian International Movie Awards navigational boxes

A tag has been placed on Category:South Indian International Movie Awards navigational boxes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry and undisclosed paid editing. Note that per WP:REVERTBAN any edits that you make in violation of your block may be reverted by any editor without regard for whether they are helpful or not. That means that any articles you create in violation of this block may be deleted. You will be wasting your time if you continue to edit at Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Godavari Telugu

The article Godavari Telugu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neither source mentions this particular dialect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Godavari Telugu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Godavari Telugu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godavari Telugu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:00, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Filmfare Awards South records

Hello, Tarunq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Filmfare Awards South records, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Paritala Nirupam

Hello, Tarunq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paritala Nirupam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cycle (2021 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cycle (2021 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cycle (2021 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ab207 (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paritala Nirupam

Hello, Tarunq. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paritala Nirupam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:47, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of highest-grossing South Indian films for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article List of highest-grossing South Indian films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highest-grossing South Indian films until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ab207 (talk) 15:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OMG Daddy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OMG Daddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMG Daddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DareshMohan (talk) 08:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]