User talk:Tarotcards

Welcome!

Hello, Tarotcards, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 00:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Earth"

I noticed you made some edits recently changing "the Earth" to "earth." Although "the Earth" is somewhat awkward, Earth the planet does in fact have a capital letter. Lowercase earth means dirt. Andre (talk) 19:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the following from dictionary.com: earth [urth] Pronunciation Key –noun 1. (often initial capital letter) the planet third in order from the sun, having an equatorial diameter of 7926 mi. (12,755 km) and a polar diameter of 7900 mi. (12,714 km), a mean distance from the sun of 92.9 million mi. (149.6 million km), and a period of revolution of 365.26 days, and having one satellite. 2. the inhabitants of this planet, esp. the human inhabitants: The whole earth rejoiced. 3. this planet as the habitation of humans, often in contrast to heaven and hell: to create a hell on earth. 4. the surface of this planet: to fall to earth. [...] 9. Also called earth color. Fine Arts. any of various pigments consisting chiefly of iron oxides and tending toward brown in hue. 10. Chiefly British Electronics. a ground. 11. Archaic. a land or country. –verb (used with object) 12. Chiefly British Electronics. to ground. —Idioms 13. move heaven and earth. heaven (def. 7). 14. on earth, in the world: Where on earth have you been? 15. run to earth, a. Hunting. to chase (an animal) into its hole or burrow: to run a fox to earth. b. to search out; track down: They ran the fugitive to earth in Algiers. [Origin: bef. 950; ME erthe, OE eorthe; c. G Erde, D aarde, ON jǫrth, Dan jord, Goth airtha]

... often does not mean always, andre. in fact, you will notice that, in all of their examples, they have used a lowercase earth. looks like the standard, preferred usage is lowercase. of course, each individual has a particular preference, such as the serial comma, interior placement of commas within quotes and parentheses, etc. thanks for your attempt at bettering my edits, though, it was a nice try. keep up the good effort, every tiny positive change we make singularly cumulates plurally here on wiki. how about a toast, in mutual admiration of our planet, a toast for peace on earth; for, even if it may be unattainable, it can still be striven for. regards, tarotcards. 20.07.06.20.16.43.33

Hello... sorry to tell you this, but your recent changes involving lower-case "earth" and "Luna" have been reverted. The consensus in science articles is to use "the Moon". "Luna" is considered non-standard amongst astronomers and in the English language. Similarly, the general standard is to use capital-"E" "Earth. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat _spy 00:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review of [[Image:Max-Planck-und-Albert-Einstein.jpg]]

Here is a notification that the deletion of [[Image:Max-Planck-und-Albert-Einstein.jpg]] is being reviewed. The DrV may be found at this location. "Wikipedia:Deletion review considers disputed deletions and disputed decisions made in deletion-related discussions. This includes appeals to restore pages that have been deleted..." In the DrV, users may discuss relevant issues in attempting to form consensus, as well as assert Uphold Deletion or Overturn Deletion, with a specific rationale for the stated conclusion. ... Kenosis 16:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Measurement Causes Collapse

You might find this interesting:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Measurement_causes_collapse

And their unfortunate attempt to delete it:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Measurement_causes_collapse

Lordvolton (talk) 11:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pandemic Severity Index

I might have reverted something that you want to put back in. I'm tired, but some asshole (not you) added stuff he made up. WAS 4.250 (talk) 23:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.

Due to your past contribution to Singularitarianism, you may want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

I feel Loremaster is editing Singularitarianism and Technological utopianism in a biased manner in accordance with his Save The Earth propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards Neo-Luddism. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion:

Loremaster says he is:

"...critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms."

Loremaster wants people to:

"...stop indulging in techno-utopian fantasies... ...so that we can all focus on energies on saving the planet."

Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states:

"Although I am convinced that the world is in fact heading toward an ecological catastrophe, I think it can be averted and my optimism makes me want to fight to do do just that."

86.174.64.123 (talk) 12:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)?[reply]

LOL
Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a technorealist who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the Technological utopianism article. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding this article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book Citizen Cyborg).
I find it disgusting that User:86.174.64.123 would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.
In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia.

--Loremaster (talk) 13:14, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gell-Mann matrices, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Matrix and Trace. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equivalence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tarotcards. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milankovitch cycles

Yes, I see your point, the Earth's orbit is not an ellipse except an ellipse one might draw with one of those pens with a motor in it. But your edit replaces a categorical statement with a vague one, in order to reference something that is very much off-topic. What about restoring the original text and slapping a footnote on it that "Technically, the ellipse is drawn by the center of mass of the Earth-Moon system." Are there additional qualifications to the ellipse model that deserve mention? Spike-from-NH (talk) 01:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tarotcards. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]