User talk:Tanvir9091

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tanvir9091! Thank you for your contributions. I am Jaaron95 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! JAaron95 ^Talk 17:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Atwal‎

Please stop adding unsourced additions to the Atwal article, Wikipedia does not accept information based on your "knowledge" or "personal research" - please see WP:Original research
All material added must be cited to a reliable source so the information can be verified - please add sources for the information you have added and note that Denzil Ibbetson and other Victorian writers are not normally considered reliable sources. - Arjayay (talk) 09:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Atwal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Atwal. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 13:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Please don't just keep hitting the "undo" button or putting back information when others remove it; even if you think you're in the right, edit-warring to keep your information in the article causes the article to be unstable, making it less useful for readers. Also, please read the messages above about original research and citations. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be summaries of what other sources (secondary sources, not primary sources) say about a topic, and adding information based on your own experience, or adding information without a citation to explain where you got the information, makes it impossible for articles' readers to trust the article, because they can't know if the information came from a trustworthy place. Nyttend (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 13:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We do not normally delete talk pages, so I've removed your deletion request. —SpacemanSpiff 14:58, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]