User talk:Tantidharo

{{Notify me |language=en |project=wikipedia |username=sritantara }} Tantidharo (talk) 02:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tantidharo! I am Worm That Turned and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Worm 13:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to your query

Hi Tantidharo. I'm responding to your question regarding talk page messaging. Well, Wikipedia is a collaborative working environment, anyone can edit any article. So, to promote harmonious editing, communication is vital. (see more at Help:Using talk pages) There are many ways to communicate on wikipedia, there are specific talk pages for each article where changes to that article can be discussed, there are message boards for assistance over the place and if you want a personal approach, you can contact a user directly. Each user has their own talk page, and when you leave them a message, an orange bar appears telling them they have new messages (I expect you got one from me!). This allows you to ask editor specific questions, ask for assistance, or anything you like. As to the four tildas (~~~~), the software automatically substitutes your signature and current timestamp, so we know who the message is from. I hope this answers your question, but if it doesn't feel free to let me know (either here or at my talk page), am always available to help. Happy Holidays! Worm 08:57, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, I meant to mention the {{helpme}} feature. If you create a new section on your own talk page (here), and type {{helpme}}, followed by your question, someone will be along very shortly to answer you. It's very useful if there person you regularly contact is offline, or you don't mind who answers your questions. Worm 09:01, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saint Chot

The article Saint Chot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 23:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Troy Dean Harris

The article Troy Dean Harris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability - most of the references don't even mention him

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 23:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please refrain from writing autobiographical articles, as you did at Troy Dean Harris. Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged; if you create such an article, it may be deleted. All edits to articles must conform to our policies on no original research, neutral point of view, and avoid conflicts of interest. Please remember that Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a personal webspace provider. If your achievements are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. It's clear from your user page that you are Troy Dean Harris. andy (talk) 23:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Troy Dean Harris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troy Dean Harris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troy Dean Harris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy (talk) 23:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saint Chot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint Chot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Chot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Saint Chot. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. andy (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]