User talk:Tamccullough
Disputed use of table split in #Current_squad section of Atlético Ottawa
[edit]https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Atl%C3%A9tico_Ottawa
It sounds like your issue is less with the Squad section of this page and more with the https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football in general. This is a style guide that began 16 years ago and continues to be improved upon as time goes by. Conforming to this style guide is imperative in keeping this football club page in line with Wikipedia standards. Being in line with other Canadian Premier League club pages is not a legitimate reasoning as those club pages should be conforming to this style guide as well. I will not engage in further edit warring but this single article is not the appropriate forum to air grievances about a longstanding WikiProject and I would suggest introducing a third opinion to resolve this dispute. Mongeese (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
In the same way that the https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football is a proposal, so too does the https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Tables state that it is only advised against to split tables, leaving the possibility open should the community see it fit. As the lengthy discussion linked by User:Nehme1499 shows, the two column format is preferred when responsive is not possible. I will be reverting the changes to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Atl%C3%A9tico_Ottawa#Current_squad and if you wish to continue the discussion about your disagreement with the established format I would request that you do so on the https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football talk page (as you already have began) or with said user, rather than on this specific article. Mongeese (talk) 01:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Mongeese: Both templates are valid. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Hicetnunc. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Jamiebuba Sorry! Thank you! Tamccullough (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hicetnunc
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hicetnunc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David Gerard (talk) 12:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Hicetnunc
[edit]Hello, Tamccullough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hicetnunc, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Hicetnunc
[edit]Hello, Tamccullough. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hicetnunc".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)