Jump to content

User talk:Talleyrand20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arab or Berber emirate

[edit]

Why do you think it was Arab-ruled? Or what, rather, do you think "Arab emirate" means in the sources? Our article says "Arab-ruled", but the emirs were probably not Arabs, but Berbers. Srnec (talk) 23:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Warning

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

--Omar-toons (talk) 15:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Ottoman Algeria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aṭlas (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  NeilN talk to me 14:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for striving for a balanced and fair view of history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Россиянин2019 (talkcontribs) 18:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of busiest container ports, you may be blocked from editing. Citobun (talk) 08:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and ongoing RfC

[edit]

You should self-revert your last edit at Adrian Zenz since it’s edit-warring and the material is being discussed at the ongoing Request for Comment. Pitch in at the RfC if you’d like, but please don’t add the material back through edit-warring. — MarkH21talk 09:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]