User talk:TallCorgi

Dogpatch USA

Thanks for all your work on the Dogpatch article, it's been one of my projects and obsessions for more than 10 years now. --The_stuart (talk) 18:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I've had a good time researching it and tracking down references. TallCorgi (talk) 04:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TallCorgi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TallCorgi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Historic District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dogpatch USA, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marshall, Wisconsin and Herschell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear TallCorgi, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Benjamin Franklin Smallwood House. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 19:09, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

recently deleted article "Mechanical stability of nanoparticle agglomerates aerosolized from nano-powders"

Hi TallCorgi,

Thanks for your message, this added article is from one of my own publication in a scientific journal. The paper is under a common license for open access from general publics as stated in the below link:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

" You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. "

But to avoid complexity I can re-write a small section just for wikipedia publication.

Thanks.

Best regards, Yaobo Ding — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dyb450303 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page "Mechanical stability of nanoparticle agglomerates aerosolized from nano-powders"

Dear TallCorgi,

I've submitted a new article which is a mini-review about stability of airborne nanoparticles. But still I found the deleted page of the old article when I search it in Google. On the page it says the article has been deleted under the reason of "Unambiguous copyright infringement". To avoid confusions to the readers could you edit the page so that the deletion does not appear anymore in Google.

Thanks.

Best regards, Yaobo

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Humphreys, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Humphreys, Oklahoma

The USGS source you provided is for Creta. Bazj (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know; I fixed it.TallCorgi (talk) 22:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Judson College

I am writing in reference to your list of women's colleges in the United States. I did not find Judson College in Marion, Alabama on the list. Judson was founded in 1838 by Milo P. Jewett. It prides itself on being a liberal arts college for women. The list of successes by Judson graduates is impressive. It is still operating in Marion and her alumnae are very proud and very supportive.

All articles on Wikipedia are free for anyone to edit (so even though I have edited women's colleges articles, they aren't my articles), so if you see a place where Judson should be included, feel free to add it! If you don't want to edit it yourself, you can give me the title or a link to the article, and I will see if there is information I can add. Because there are multiple articles and lists about women's colleges, I'm not sure where you noticed it was missing; it looks to me like Judson is mentioned in many of the women's colleges articles, including the list section of Women's colleges in the United States, the 1830s section of the list Timeline of women's colleges in the United States, the Alabama section of List of current and historical women's universities and colleges in the United States, where it is in bold to show that it is still operating as a women's college today, the current women's colleges section of Women's colleges in the Southern United States, and the Women's College Coalition page. It's also in the Template:Current women's universities and colleges in the United States which is included on the bottom of pages about women's colleges. I'm replying to you here on my userpage where you originally posted, but I'm going to copy this to your talk page too because I'm not sure where you are more likely to see it.TallCorgi (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)TallCorgi (talk) 06:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you!

		The Civility Barnstar
		For being understanding when you had every right to be annoyed. :) Marianna251TALK 00:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma NRHPs

Hi, I am happy to see some links on my watchlist lighting up, as you added/modified templates on various Oklahoma NRHP articles. Thanks for developing Corliss Steam Engine (Pawnee, Oklahoma) by adding and using content from its NRHP nomination. That article is one on a list of 17 OK NRHP articles that I have been meaning to get back to, to do what you did.

FYI, the NRHP nomination document reference format that I use is very much like yours, but uses the {{NRHP url}} template twice, which might provide some future benefit if the National Park Service moves its NRHP files again (because just the template can be updated, to fix broken links). What I do is copy/paste the following: <ref name=nrhpdoc>{{cite web|url={{NRHP url|id=}}|title=National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination: (or Registration:) |publisher=[[National Park Service]]|author= |date= |accessdate= }} with {{NRHP url|id=|photos=y|title=photos}}</ref> into an article, then I modify it, as I have just done at Donald Pollock House, Oklahoma City, OK. Any way is fine, though. Thanks! --do ncr am 16:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip on the NRHP documentation citations; I wasn't really sure what the best way to cite them was, so having this to copy/paste will really help!TallCorgi (talk) 17:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have been developing a few more of those OK NRHP articles, and find my way back to you again, via your sandbox list (at User:TallCorgi/sandbox) by my checking "What links here?" on Conklin House (Chandler, Oklahoma). I put that into a combo article Territorial Homes of Chandler. I am leaving the Territorial Homes of Chandler article with an "under construction" tag for the moment, and will get back to it. Say, do you take pics of Oklahoma places? If there's any chance you'd ever be in the area, I'd like a pic for the Kee House in Chandler covered there, which seems not to be NRHP-listed for some reason so it is not on any photographer's "To do" list.

Is the sandbox you have set up so that you can notice/monitor any changes on all of those articles? Does it cover redlinks where articles might be created, that are of interest to you? I am curious how you set it up and what it accomplishes. cheers, --do ncr am 17:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not actually doing anything with the sandbox right now. The sandbox was for a big project I did awhile back to update the Oklahoma recent changes page. The page is generated based on a list, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oklahoma/Oklahoma recent changes, and I think I pasted the contents of the sandbox into the list. I will go ahead and clean up the sandbox so all those articles aren't linking back to me. TallCorgi (talk) 23:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TallCorgi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TallCorgi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bromide Junction, Oklahoma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bromide Junction, Oklahoma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bromide Junction, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hog Farm _Talk 01:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]