User talk:Talatr

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Defense of Van 1915, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talatr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Talatr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Reminder

Hello. I note this edit [1] where you've described the page Armenian resistance during the Armenian genocide as entirely written by Armenian racists. This is just a reminder of the WP:ASPERSIONS. Thank you.Maidyouneed (talk) 01:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 04:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talatr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did you dismiss me because I wrote that the name of a local area in the Turkish Republic was changed as a propaganda tool? Talatr (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You won't be unblocked to edit about Turkish/Armenian issues; if you want to edit about something else, please tell what that might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I blocked you because you are clearly only on Wikipedia to use it to make nationalistic attacks against Armenians. Your conduct is not acceptable here. Acroterion (talk) 04:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Against the Armenians? Am I being anti-Armenian because I say that a mountain in the Turkish republic is named as an Armenian mountain? What would you think if you saw a page arranged as New Amsterdam, the old name of New York? Here the mountain is shown as if it does not belong to Turkey. Look at the model with an unbiased eye.

@Acroterion: What I'm doing here is fixing a destroyed article. It is a situation similar to showing the name of Istanbul as Constantinapolis.

Mount Ararat is a name and picture that has been used for centuries. When you want to send a letter, you can be sure that it will not arrive when you write Ararat. 80 million people in Turkey do not even have the slightest idea of the name Ararat.Talatr (talk) 04:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Google Maps : https://www.google.com/maps/@39.6837973,44.2041128,11z

The English Wikipedia has no say in the conduct of other language Wikipedias. Your other edits make it clear that you are not editing constructively. Acroterion (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: The edits I have made are extremely constructive. To give a very simple example, I am trying to explain that the uprising of a people against the government in a region is not a defense but a rebellion. If this is the change you're talking about, you know better the difference between rebellion and defense. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Defense_of_Van_(1915) The mentioned city is a city belonging to the Ottoman Empire. As a result of an uprising in the city, the city passed into the hands of the Armenians. but this is not a defense, it is a rebellion. Do you think this is an unconstructive view? When the trump parties storm and take over the parliament, do you call it rebellion or defense?Talatr (talk) 04:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talatr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why do you forbid me to write in Turkish-Armenian articles? Which wikipedia policy did I violate? and what change I made caused this violation? Talatr (talk) 09:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talatr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My question is very simple. I was blocked for what post.Which policy of wikipedia did I violate?You must explain the reason why you sent me away. This is your duty. Talatr (talk) 10:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No it is your duty to understand why you were blocked, which you obviously do not. I also see your talk page access was reovked, if you want to request an unlobkc you can do so at WP:UTRS. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:GAB explains how to craft an appropriate unblock request. You risk losing talk page access if you continue to abuse the unblock template. --Yamla (talk) 10:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]