Jump to content

User talk:Tajtheman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Till someone unblocks me!





Hello (Adoption)

[edit]

Hi, I'm Barkjon, a good friend of JetLover. I saw that you would like to be adopted. I have around 1,000 edits, have graduated from the adoption program, am well-versed in Wikipedia, and have adopted a user. But I will adopt you, if you want. Reply on my talk page.-- Barkjon  00:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tips

[edit]

This is where I'll give you tips. Oh ya, I'm not totally a F1 fan, but I am in that WikiProject.

  • You graduate from the Adopt-a-User program when you feel confident to edit on your own.
  • Vandalism is when a user changes something good on a page to something bad or disrubtive.
  • Rollbacks are users who use a special tool to revert vandalism quicker.
  • Sysops are users who can block users, delete, protect, and un-protect pages, and make other users rollbacks. They can also rollback.
  • Bureacrats are users who can do the same things as sysops, but, in addition, they can make other users bots, sysops, and other bureacrats.

-- Barkjon  00:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well in the last few days I have reverted a lot of vandalism, what else should I do. I was thinking of making a article about Kiwah Island, off the coast of South Carolina.

WPF1 Newsletter

[edit]

Thank you for receiving the WPF1 newsletter (WPF1 NW). If you would like the NW sent out yesterday thjen I will personally do so. The next one will be in May. If you have any queries contact me or any other contributors of it. Chubbennaitor 08:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Adoption

[edit]

Thanks for asking, but I have to work something out before I can adopt you. I wouldn't want you to get involved. I will give you a notice in a while. Thanks again.--RyRy5 talk 02:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last WPF1 NW

[edit]

I'm giving it to you anyway. Oh, I see you're new. Well welcome.

--Chubbennaitor 16:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adopter

[edit]

For now, you can be my unofficial adoptee. It will be official when something is over (can't tell you). Is that Ok with you?--RyRy5 Got something to say? 23:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, it just is that my adopter, your former teacher, is not doing anything except for giving me 5 tips, he hasn't even replied to me yet. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 23:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please talk back on my talk page from now on? And what do you want to learn first?--RyRy5 Got something to say? 00:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More tips

[edit]

You're already mutinying me? Geez, give me time, dude.

  • A good way to undo vandalism (and get more edits fast) is: Go to the recent changes and look for an IP address (a username all made from numbers-that person has not made an official account). Click on that page. Click on history. There should be an IP address (the one you saw in the recent changes). Click "compare selected versions". And when it shows up, there should be vandalism in the screen. Click undo and change what the vandalism is to what it used to be.
  • Wanna make a good signature like mine? One that you did yourself? Go to: Wikipedia:Smurrayinchester's signature tutorial and start it! Read it all, buddy.
  • Don't worry, I forgive you for trying to "escape" my adoption. No hard feelings.
  • Barnstars are the main type of awards here on Wikipedia.
  • If you have any other questions, tell me.

-- Barkjon  01:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More tips 2

[edit]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Tajtheman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
71.240.2.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Steelcity95". The reason given for Steelcity95's block is: "Vandalism".

Decline reason: Clearly a sockpuppet, this account is now blocked directly. — Yamla (talk) 18:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tajtheman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what is a sock puppet first of all and i don't even know who steelcity95 or whatever, why me, i am adopted, i have reverted vandalism, what have i done wrong, barkjon help me!

Decline reason:

You certainly look like the same user to me. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please unblock

[edit]

please i am not a sock puppet, i promise i will not do anything wrong again, i love wikipedia, someone help me barkjon, nrdg, or ryry5. Tajtheman (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you are editing the same articles from the same IP address as the blocked vandal, Steelcity95 (talk · contribs). --Yamla (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i founded chasing zoey, so what if another user smarts editing there, I have never done anything on Cleveland and Charleston airports,

just because he started editing on chasing zoey doesn't mean, i conrol this guy, also do i go around and pretty much delete 

5 articles, no  Tajtheman (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the real answer

[edit]

well you guys are all right, i lied, steelcity95 is my other account, i used it because everyone doesn't even care about what i contribute, so is started a " a bad account. so i understood what i did wrong, and i promise it won't happen again. Could you only block me for a week not indefinitely, and if i break this promise you can kick me out of wikipedia for good. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, have you reviewed my confession, please let me back with just my account, not steelcity95, just block that one, or i will just delete it totally. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 23:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC). Also could you contact Barkjon, for me! Thanks again Tajtheman (talk) 23:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your long history of abuse means that I am disinclined to unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 23:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For how long, i can't even last a half of a day! Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 23:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given your outright lies and long history of vandalism, I believe "indefinite" is the best answer. --Yamla (talk) 23:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock me, i promise not to vandalize or use several accounts. Tajtheman (talk) 23:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have already shown that your word cannot be trusted. --Yamla (talk) 23:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so how long is indefinite. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 00:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite. --Yamla (talk) 00:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't opening for me, could you just tell me. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 00:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Without limit; forever, or until further notice; not definite." --Yamla (talk) 00:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well ok, if you change your mind tell me. Other than that I am sorry for what i have caused it the last few hours. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

barkjon

[edit]

help, no one is replying to my confession, could you help me get my block down from indefinite to one week. Thanks ! Tajtheman (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you barkjon! Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey can you still give me tips since i am blocked for like 3 months. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 00:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, yes I can still give you tips. But, I am sorry, but I can't remove your block. I am a rollback but not a administrator. Tips:

One problem with that, i can only edit my user-page! Also i happened to come across your argument with Philipi and ryry5, i would like to choose, you. That editing strategy is good, i just went on recent changes and 5 ip addresses has just vandalized, (I am blocked so can't revert. Lastly, i am sorry for trying to abandon you, Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 11:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

at least pittsburgh airport

[edit]

If anything, can i just edit pittsburgh airport, i would really appreciate it. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 20:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. Your history of abuse shows this would be inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could we try it for a little, and if i vandalize then i get banned. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. Your history of abuse shows this would be inappropriate. I am also stunned that you have used your other abusive account, Steelcity95 (talk · contribs), to try to get unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever account gets unblocked first is the one i am going to use, and then throw the other one away. Tajtheman (talk) 20:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate. Stick to one now. But at this point, you really need to walk away for a while. Nobody's going to unblock you this quickly, not with your history of abuse. You need to build up some trust. --Yamla (talk) 20:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i'll walk away, but mark my word i am a different person now. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked!

[edit]

You know you were on about nobody noticing your contributions. Many people notice your contribs no matter what. Oh, by the way. Lying isn't the good way out of things and put you in eve bigger trouble. Chubbennaitor 16:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and u have my trust. Chubbennaitor 16:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that means a lot to me. Tajtheman (talk) 00:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are off the Recipients list until you are back. Chubbennaitor 19:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unblocking

[edit]

Come on someone unblock me it has almost been a month! Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

[edit]

{{unblock|it has been one month and i will now make constructive edits on wikipedia }}

It is a blatant lie that this user has been blocked for one month. Given the obvious bad faith nature of this unblock request, I suggest speedily declining the unblock at the very least. --Yamla (talk) 01:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I read somewhere, that you could let me talk on talk pages only so people can edit things that they get from me which is appropriate. Thanks Tajtheman (talk) 03:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is not possible, and your continued sockpuppetry shows that you have no intention of reforming. --Yamla (talk) 21:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla

[edit]

You are not very nice are you, i saw that you declined someone who wanted a unblock when he didn't do any thing. Try to lighten up a little. Taj 20:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

AAU reminder notice

[edit]
A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =)
Hey there Tajtheman! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers!

Unblock

[edit]

hey can somone unblock me it has been almost 6th months i am a new person barkjon will help me. thanks

Please use Template:Unblock next time.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 05:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tajtheman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have served my time and i'm ready to contribute to wikipedia in a constructive way, not in a disruptive way, i will only only use this account and not any of the sock puppets. Thank you, and i will respect what ever you say.

Decline reason:

Please try again and tell us in detail how you intend to contribute constructively. See also {{2ndchance}}.  Sandstein  19:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh activity

[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh is rolling out some new features (see our discussions at WT:PITTSBURGH). We are also trying to determine how many members are active, and interested in contributing to Pittsburgh content or coming to our real life meetups to discuss Wikipedia in general. If you could go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh/Members and move your name from inactive to the active or semi-active group (depending on your interest in Pittsburgh issue and overall activity) groups, this would be great. Hopefully in a near future you'll also receive our first newsletter with various information on what we have been doing, and what useful tools are available. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tajtheman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been four years since I last edited, I have served my time and learned from what I did. I will no longer abuse my use of Wikipedia. I will never write disruptive things again.

Decline reason:

Again, how do you intend to edit constructively? Please provide details, and consider following the instructions at {{2nd chance}}. Hersfold non-admin(t/a/c) 21:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Invitation

[edit]

Hello! I'm Jacqueline Yeung, currently a Carnegie Mellon Researcher at the Human Computer Interaction Institute. The Project Pittsburgh page referred us to you as a Pittsburgh Wikipedian.

We'd would like to invite you to our HCI lab at CMU to gather and meet other fellow Pittsburgh Wikipedians. I'm so excited to meet you and learn about your experiences with Wikipedia. Please comment at Pittsburgh MeetUP 2015 .

Regards JMyraYeung (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tajtheman&oldid=1089995455"