User talk:Tajdink

External links

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Drug interaction. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Boghog (talk) 22:27, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Doctor's Desktop

A tag has been placed on Doctor's Desktop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dac04 (talk) 19:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Koyyode

The article Koyyode has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disputable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guerillero | My Talk 20:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zeetech soft Solution

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Zeetech soft Solution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the page that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 10:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notify author/project: == Proposed deletion of Doctors Desktop ==

The article Doctors Desktop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. References based on primary sources and PR announcements.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

doctors desktop

You've added this several times to the List of open source healthcare software; however, it is not open source. Please stop adding it, or demonstrate that it is open source.--KarlB (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion. You were warned about this three years ago, but have continued to post spam: it is amazing that you were not blocked long before this. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a free advertising service. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block, {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:33, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tajdink (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Really , i am inexperienced using the right word for my very useful site and software .I have developed my site (www.desktopindia.com) as very useful Medical informative site by providing many useful links , free softwares and many things .It is my inexperience that led to wikipedia's block by using the sentences which is like spam or advertisements , i always wished if any of experienced editors of wikipedia review my site and contribute the writing for the site and software Tajdink (talk) 10:00 pm, Yesterday (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

I'm sure your site is fabulous. However, you are not allowed to promote it here by constantly adding links to it. If you don't have any other interest in Wikipedia beyond promoting your site, then you have no need of this account, and therefore there is no point in unblocking it. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tajdink (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept my mistakes for proposing my own interests , but sure i can contribute many more things in future as part of my research in medical field , now i am slowly learning how to edit and create article and make my own contribution to wikipedia ,this is my appeal , please unblock me , i will not use my account for further spam or advertising links

Decline reason:

Account used for promotional purposes only. Since you have no desire to edit now, and only in the future, there is no need to unblock the account. If you wish to be unblocked, describe what edits you would do when unblocked. v/r - T P 22:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

External links

More on external links

Speedy deletion nomination of Doctor's Desktop

Proposed deletion of Koyyode

Speedy deletion nomination of Zeetech soft Solution

doctors desktop