User talk:Taintain

VVPAT Issue

Please see the comments by Joebeone (Talk) http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Voter_Verified_Paper_Audit_Trail&curid=4467529&diff=90493228&oldid=88446608. I think Joe's explanation might be more clear and in depth. --Election Technology 06:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch Voting Machines

I know Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet has their report on the Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting systems and it includes being able to record spurious emissions, but there has been talk of of problems with the SDu NewVote voting machines. Do you have any information on the possible problems with the SDu NewVote voting machines (preferably in English)? --Electiontechnology 17:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links any idea if those machines used CRT monitors? --Electiontechnology 18:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nedap

Hello, I have restored the Nedap article into it's shortened length. The article itself is completely about electronic voting and as such does not tell anything about the company itself. On the discussion page http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Nedap some remarks are made about this. I guess it would be nice if new editions of the article are discussed there? Cheers, --LeonK 03:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Election denial movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Election denial movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Election denial movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. rootsmusic (talk) 01:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]