User talk:Tailpipeartist

Feel free to write comments on this page.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Tailpipeartist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 03:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add defamatory content once again, as you did to O'monte Jackson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 02:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I just wrote about a event that happened to O'monte Jackson. I think it deserves to be on wikipedia if he got arrested. tailpipeartist (talk) 02:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just provide a source and you're fine.Yeago (talk) 01:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks tailpipeartist (talk) 02:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tailpipeartist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Whoa! What happened? I haven't edited Wikipedia in over a month and now I come back to find myself blocked? Honestly, I'm sorry if this about the O'Monte Jackson page. I just thought it was important to add an arrest to his page. I'm sorry if I offended anybody. As for this sockpuppet, I don't understand the context to this block. I have no relationship to this user. If you chekc my history, you will see I am a honorable editor and I wish for my block to be revoked.

Decline reason:

What happened was you were found by a CheckUser to be abusing multiple accounts, and as such you were blocked. — Tiptoety ^talk 04:23, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tailpipeartist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But ive only used 1 account!

Decline reason:

That's not how it looks to me. Care to explain the behavior of Werebacksons (talk · contribs)? – Luna Santin (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tailpipeartist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No i dont care to explain because i know nothing about him. I go to the university of oregon so i share the ip address with several people. no doubt that somebody else was behind this werebacksons character.

Decline reason:

Both of you place unblock requests mere minutes apart? Either he's sitting next to you or you're lying. Garden. 21:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Jamal Freeman

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jamal Freeman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

un-referenced and insufficient assertion of notability (also orphan)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 12:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]