User talk:Tailkinker

Welcome!

Hello, Tailkinker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Michaelas10 17:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tailkinker! What do you think about leaving just a couple phrases about each character in the fables page? so the user does not have to be jumping around unless he wants to know more about the characters. Just a suggestion. Stellatomailing 04:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tailkinker, I have the same question - where to answer those things? Anyway, I prefer having a couple phrases there, but the rationale is perfect.

PS: I am too hairy to be a Stella - my last name is Stellato. :-)

Stellatomailing 17:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: btw, what do you think about creating some pages for the story arcs? a good idea?

Stellatomailing 21:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation Page for Haley Starshine

You... are a Philistine. I know your type. You think that encyclopedias should have in them only knowledge that is practical and can be used to get a passing grade in something. "Encyclopedia" means general knowledge. It doesn't matter that the knowledge can be found elsewhere, either. Most knowledge in an encyclopedia can be found elsewhere. Moreover, it doesn't matter that there is no context for the translations here; the places in which she speaks her crytograms are linked on the page.

You just don't like fun. You are the worst kind of editor; the kind that would eliminate knowledge based on his own subjective standard, rather than looking at things objectively. Sadly, there are more of you than there are editors of my type, and you squat on the deletion boards. You'll more than likely win this battle, but I will continue to fight for what I believe in, and call you what you are; an obstreperous jerk.--ttogreh 03:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution. I hope you don't mind, but, as this is really relevant to the page in question rather than to myself directly, I've chosen to reply in the discussion page there. --Tailkinker 10:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know, for someone who accused me of being an "otaku", you sure put a heck of a lot of effort into getting that post deleted. Sounds like someone had a bit too much time on his hands, and I think I can go into some pretty good reasons......

--NeoAC 23 December 2006

OK, now I know....

Thank you for explaining your reasons. As I said before, I am still relatively new here, and am still learning my way around. Hopefully, in the future, any article I create will be more acceptable. I appreciate the constructive criticism, and hopefully, next time we discuss something, it will be on better terms. --NeoAC 27 December 2006

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Durkon.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Durkon.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is silly

Haley's alignment is explicitly stated to be "chaotic good-ish" which is not the same as unspecified. I'm not sure how well any of this meshes with wikipedia's policy regarding fiction. The reason I removed the statement is because, unsourced, it represents a distortion. Impressions and even obvious deductions really do qualify as original research. i kan reed 00:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary on Order of the Stick

Re-read that cryptogram. It translates as "Chaotic good-ish". You said that there was no "ish" about it. That's incorrect. Just thught I'd point it out. i kan reed 16:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Redcloak.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Redcloak.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image:Roy Greenhilt

Fair use rationale for Image:RoyGreenhilt.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RoyGreenhilt.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --RedHillian 00:12, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flycatcher.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Flycatcher.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello there

I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.

At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars

If you are interested by all means feel free to join

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 20:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bluefables.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bluefables.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ElanOOTS.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:ElanOOTS.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Belkar.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Belkar.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HaleyStarshine.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:HaleyStarshine.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Elan3.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Elan3.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Linearguild.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Linearguild.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Xykon.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Xykon.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Totenkinder.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Totenkinder.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vaarsuvius.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vaarsuvius.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please See

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons should answer your concerns. In short, since the Doom programmer is a real, living person, certain rules must apply. There is no alternative. Lots42 (talk) 01:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your questions; I missed the information about the other person you mentioned. I will go back and remove it. As for your other points; first, yes it may be obvious but even still, we need sources. And since it concerns a real, living person in relation to an evil fictional character, we NEED sources. I don't believe I can explain it any better then the link above does. Lots42 (talk) 20:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit; me again. The other person in question is yes, being compared to a fictional character but I do not actually know if said character is evil. If you compared someone to Mickey Mouse, that'd be different, as Mickey is noble and kind. I still removed the information from the Doom article as it is unsourced and 'it's obvious' just does not cut it. Lots42 (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bigbywolf2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bigbywolf2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Fablespinocchio.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fablespinocchio.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:19, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Fablessnow.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fablessnow.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Who TLC

Hello; I noticed you had recently given some TLC to the Dr. Who article. I was unable to find any references to the Dr. Who spin-off chart song (with fairly uninspired lyrics but somewhat iconic nonetheless). I was trying to find out who released it and with what if any relationship to the BBC officially. I would rather not add time to this article at the moment but do like to see truth (and arcane nostalgic chart music) prosper. Would you be able to fix the omission from the article and/or the Dab page? I think it should go at the top or very bottom of the 'references in popular culture' section, if there was one; already my memory is hazy. Not good qualities for an editor! Thank-you for reading this and again if you are interested. Kathybramley (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Adam Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Casey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Snow White (Fables) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snow White (Fables) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snow White (Fables) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TTN (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frau Totenkinder

The article Frau Totenkinder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 02:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flycatcher (comics)

The article Flycatcher (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flycatcher (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flycatcher (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flycatcher (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TTN (talk) 11:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]