User talk:Tafkira2

Welcome!

Hello, Tafkira2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Huon (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tafkira2. You have new messages at Huon's talk page.
Message added 13:17, 13 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mann (oncologist).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mike (talk) 05:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mann (oncologist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mann (oncologist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mann (oncologist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mann (oncologist), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mann (oncologist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mann (oncologist), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Mann (oncologist) (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruce Mann (oncologist).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zach Vega (talk to me) 16:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Mann (oncologist) has been accepted

Bruce Mann (oncologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Darylgolden^(talk) 07:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me! with my status?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can you please help me clarify my editing status? I'm not sure I'm allowed to edit pages on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, because I don't know where I stand with the new 500-edit anti-war rule. I do greatly appreciate and respect your efforts to restrain wars on these controversial sites! However, I'm an academic researcher (political science professor) specializing on the subject and do wish to contribute well-documented information to some of these pages. I have never been sanctioned, for my contributions to these pages (or any others). Many thanks!

Tafkira2 (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tafkira2, you will have to wait 30 days and have 500 edits to edit this article. There's nothing that we can do. If you really are serious about editing this article, wait until you can edit it, as it shows that you are not a vandal. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Platypus. How do I see how many edits I have already? Tafkira2 (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The entry on Cuzcatlan is really terrible, drawn apparently from outdated and government sites that tell little of interest to most readers and get many details wrong. Shocked by the quality I've made some quick changes to amend some of the more egregious mistakes - such as treating the mythical Atlacatl as a real person! - but the page still lacks citations and proper scholarship, providing only a list of websites. I can keep working on it, as I worked with the literature briefly at one point, but the article should be flagged as badly needing proper sources and citations by historians.Tafkira2 (talk) 13:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Icewhiz (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note you may not edit Arab-Israeli conflict content until you are WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED.Icewhiz (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ARBPIA General prohibition

This edit violates the WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 restriction. I strongly suggest you self revert lest this be reported to the appropriaye forum.Icewhiz (talk) 19:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Icewhiz - since you've done me the courtesy of alerting me to my violation of the editing rules, I hand this issue over to you. My edits were made purely to correct factual mistakes in the original. I've described these in detail but they were reverted without explanation. If I cannot make them myself, I suggest that in the interest of Wikipedia's integrity as a source that you may wish to make these changes yourself. Thank you. Tafkira2 (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bruce Mann (oncologist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce Mann (oncologist), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Mann (oncologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]