User talk:Taajir

Image Tagging Image:Somalia ethnic grps 2005.jpg.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Somalia ethnic grps 2005.jpg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 03:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This map is derived from a 2002 CIA map, which is a public domain source. However, there is no source nor license information for this modified version. Also, it would help if the image cited its own sources for the revised information. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 03:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Somali people

Regarding the map image you added to Somali people: Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 04:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi:} Taajir, you cannot alter the CIA's map and then claim copyright for the new version.

But I know your information is correct so I have included it as text below the map. OK? Somali people

Jameswilson 04:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that Taajir's version of the map is correct. I am not positive that the CIA's original version is correct, either, but it is verifiable which is Wikipedia policy. Please see my comments at Talk:Somali people#Map image. Thanks. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the info Taajir added is correct. If you google Awrtable for example you will find plenty of sites that say the Awrtable live around Burtinle, 70 km south of Gerowe. But we need a better map. But I know you are not allowed to alter an image/map. That's why people kept on deleting your map. You either include it as it is or you have to find a different map. Do any of the Somali websites have a better map? Or the UN, OAU, World Bank, Institute of Strategic Studies, charities, etc? Jameswilson 00:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HAWIYE IN ETHIOPIA: This town is name after the father of the Hawiye clan that lives Ethiopia and Somalia. Link1: http://www.fallingrain.com/world/ET/7/Hawiya.html Link2: http://www.fallingrain.com/world/ET/7/Babile2.html Link3: This town about 8KM a way is named after the father of Hawiye who is Erer (IRIR) http://www.fallingrain.com/world/ET/7/Erer.html Link4: This link shows a town called "The Great Hawiye" http://www.fallingrain.com/world/ET/7/Hawuya_Guda.html

The Ancestors of Hawiyes are Buried in the heart of Ethiopia and there is evidence to support this. Please see the links provided.

Habib Abass, Ottawa, Canada. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.170.217 (talk) 04:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Leelkase subclans in the Darod article

I've left comments at Talk:Darod#Darod Jaberti subclans. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Darod. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Please instead discuss your proposed changes at Talk:Darod#Darod Jaberti subclans. Also consider the fact that there is a separate article about Leelkase which goes into much more detail about various subclans. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 04:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why you used a map that shows Ethiopia inhabited by only Darod. How about the Isaq, Karanle, Gugundabe, Sheekhaal, Hawadle and Habargidir (close to somali border). I hope you will use one that reflects the truth of the dynamics of the Somali tribes as a whole. Just tell the world something that is close to the truth.

Habib Abass.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.170.217 (talk) 03:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darod

I am a bit confused. Are you saying that:

Maj. Gen Mohamed Siad Barre is a different person to Siad Barre who was president of Somalia from 1969-1991?
Abdirashid ~~Ali~~ Shermarke is a different person to Abdirashid Ali Shermarke who was president of Somalia from 1967-1969?
Adde Muse Hersi is a different person to Mohamud Muse Hersi who is the president of Puntland?

I researched this a bit and they look like the same people to me. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Goldogob_Somalia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Goldogob_Somalia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:GaldogobH.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GaldogobH.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 22:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same with Image:Galdogob internet.jpg. --Sherool (talk) 22:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:GaldogobCntr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GaldogobCntr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Goldogobcity_Somalia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Goldogobcity_Somalia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaalkacyo‎

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

See WP:CITE and WP:OR. Note that "I know about these things", "I come from there", "I know him", etc., cannot be used to justify changes to an article — we need verifiable sources. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained the situation; if you keep adding unsourced material – without or especially with aggressive edit summaries, from this account or without logging in – you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Moreover, edits like this are vandalism, and will get you blocked even more quickly. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mudug

Why did you change the order of the list from alphabetical; you gave no explanation:

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leelkase‎

Your edit summary was not only abusive, it made no sense; you reverted a large number of formatting corrections, including bolding, removal of duplicate wikilinking, etc. If you continue to edit and to behave disruptively and uncivilly, you may be blocked from editing. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You say that I gave no explanation or justification of my revrting of your edits; aside from my edit summaries, what do you call the above? You persistently refuse to explain what you're doing or give sources, and when you do use edit summaries it's to shout at other editors and call them biased. You're very lucky not to have been blocked from editing yet.

Please read our policies and guidelines, especially WP:CITE, WP:CIVIL, WP:Notability, and the Manual of Style. The next time you go against them you will be blocked without further warning. Your Talk page above indicates that you've been behaving badly for too long. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaalkacyo‎, Leelkase, etc.

Do not remove templates such as {{sprotected2}} from articles; persistence in this will lead to an editing block. Persistence in disruptive editing, with little or no explanation and so sources (on the basis, apparently, that you're Somali and so don't need to comply with Wikipedia guidelines and policies), will have the same effect. Given the series of warnings that you've had, there will be no warning next time; one more disruptive or vandalising edit, and you will be immediately blocked. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:OWN. You don't own articles just because you started them, nor does starting an article mean that you're no longer bound by Wikipedia policies. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour so far is such that the fact that you haven't been blocked is amazing. You've edited disruptively by trying to insist on edits that have no sources and that violate Wikipedia guidelines and policies, by trying to take ownership of articless, and by incivility. I've tried to explain these things to you, but you're not interested; you prefer to shelter behing a paranoid delusion that I'm picking on you to make myself look good... There seems no point trying to explain things to you any further, nor to point you to our guidelines and policies. If you continue to edit disruptively you'll be blocked from editing with no further warning. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as someone who hasn't been involved in this discussion: Taajir, I've seen the edit summaries you've left, such as "I will never allow you to distort the truth nor damage this article that i've been managing for years." As Mel Etitis has already mentioned, you really should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's official policy regarding ownership of articles. Remember, every time you edit a page, at the bottom it says "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly . . . do not submit it." Thanks for your consideration. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Leelkase

Taajir, thanks for contacting me. The lists of notable people have become unwieldy and mostly consist of red links. I think you'll agree that the result is a sloppy-looking article. Various editors have been trimming these lists so that they only include people for whom actual articles exist. If you believe an individual is sufficiently notable enough for inclusion on such a list, I suggest writing an article about him or her first, see whether it's able to stand on its own, and then add it to a list of notable people.

I can't answer for Mel or anyone else, but I know of another editor who is cleaning up the Somali clan articles. When confronted with the same question ("how come you did it to this clan's article and not the others?") he explained that he was working alphabetically. I suspect Mel would cite a similar reason.

I am confident that Mel Etitis does not have any anti-Somali or anti-clan agenda and is only concerned that articles adhere to Wikipedia's manual of style and policies. I would opine that Mel can be terse with his comments, but there is nothing necessarily wrong (certainly nothing uncivil) about that. (P.S. if you check his user page you'll find Mel is a male.) I can tell you that Mel is strict about Wikipedia's attribution policy (as we all should be) and he is perfectly within his rights when he removes unattributed information from articles. (Remember, the policy says that Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion is verifiability, not truth.)

I'm not sure whether this addresses all or any of your concerns, but I hope it will be of some help. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions in articles on Woredas of Ethiopia

I noticed that you reverted the contents of 8 articles to their first form, which removed a lot of information that has collected in them since last October, but did not leave an explanation for these changes. I'm puzzled at this; would you explain your reasons for this? -- llywrch 22:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks! -- Gyrofrog (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why you used a map that shows Ethiopia inhabited by only Darod. How about the Isaq, Karanle, Gugundabe, Sheekhaal, Hawadle and Habargidir (close to somali border).

I hope you will use one that reflects the truth of the dynamics of the Somali tribes as a whole. Just tell the world something that is close to the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.170.217 (talk) 03:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Hello, regarding the Darod sub-clan articles that I redirected, please see Talk:Darod#Redirects to Darod. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed Leelkase back to an article, now named Lelkase. It is now a stub with attributions. See Talk:Lelkase#Un-redirected for more details.

By the way, having re-read your talk page, I see that you have some long-standing issues regarding the motives of other editors (e.g. bias for or against a particular Somali clan) as well as ownership of articles. Based on your recent comments on my talk page and Talk:Darod, it does not appear that this has changed since your activity in 2007. The warnings that you received from other editors still apply. If you did not do so then, then I will advise you now to familiarize yourself with WP:OWN and WP:AGF. Thank you in advance. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 23:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taajir, please remember to cite reliable sources when you add information to articles such as Leelkase. Also, you only need to add your signature on talk pages, not in articles. Thanks. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 02:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Leelkase. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Other than helping out with the spelling, you have not addressed any of the concerns I have given at Talk:Leelkase. I'll also ask you not to describe my edits as abusive ([1]). You are the one reverting to a version that had long been flagged for multiple issues, then removed the "Cleanup" tag and called it a "minor adjustment" ([2]). Going forward, I will consider any edit on your part that reverts to a problematic version, or does not address the numerous concerns with the article, as disruption. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours) for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gyrofrog (talk) 03:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. See also: Talk:Leelkase#October_25. And as for my "Ethiopian agenda," you've also been warned ([3]), more than once ([4]), about questioning the motives of other editors. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 03:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GYROFROG IS ABUSING HIS POWER

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Taajir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have already left a message to Cambridgebay wheather to come and intervene this abuse of power by Gyrofrog, and i will list again the appeal i made to Cambridgebay Wheather right before i was wrongfully blocked by "Gyrofrog" from posting. I have been a sincere contributor and the originator of the Leelkase article many years ago, and i have managed to develop it further, but instead of being given credit for my works, it was vandalized by gyrofrog who made many incorrect changes about my tribe. I belong to that tribe, so i should know more info then our fellow contributor gyrofrog who is of ethiopian origins.

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. Sandstein 07:01, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admins: I'm not Ethiopian, but don't see what difference it would make if I were. See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive230#Problem_editor and Mel Etitis' previous comments on this page. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 03:59, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

here is the appeal i made to cambridgebay wheather, which i now appeal to all other seniour, fair and honest wiki administrators

i've been contributing to the article of the Leelkase tribe for years now, and i've all of a sudden came to discover that it was completely deleted at first and redirected to Darood article, for reasons still unknown. so i contacted our ethipian editor "Gyrofrog" who said after i told him that Leelkase is a subclan of Darood similar to Marehan, Majerteen, etc, etc, he then corrected that mistake. Afterwards gyrofrog changed the name of the tribe all together to something like Lelkase which is unused, and a spelling mistake, since if you google it it, the results of the name Leelkase shows 90% more results, then if you were to search under Lelkase. When he also corrected that mistake after i brought much proof to him. He did not stop there, but erased all the information about the settlements and subclans of the Leelkase altogether, and i questioned him why?? Why all the other somali subclans had a chance to write about their tribe, and write their settlements and subclans, but that he took ours out??

Please help, this is not fair, either do it for all the Somali subclans of the Darood i.e. Marehan, Dhulbahante Majerteen, and also of the Hawiye i.e. Abgaal, Murosade, Habar Gedir, etc, etc.

I cannot imagine why those other clans have a chance to write their never ending list of disorganized subclans and irrelevent information, while our section is organized and lists important facts.

Please help, and either intervene, or direct me to a someone on WIKI that can truley come and stop this abuse of power by "Gyrofrog".

Hello, Taajir. You have new messages at Middayexpress's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Taajir! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 683 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Garaad Warsame Abdi Haashi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Somalia ethnic grps 2006.jpg.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Somalia ethnic grps 2006.jpg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed this is not the first time you've made unattributed changes to an official map (you did the same with Image:Somalia ethnic grps 2005.jpg.jpg). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Goldogob city2.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Goldogob city2.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garaad Warsame Abdi Haashi

The article Garaad Warsame Abdi Haashi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:V, WP:N, possible WP:HOAX. Can't find any references to the individual via various searches Gweb/Gnews/Gbooks/Bing/etc, using a variety of name permutations. Unreferenced BLP for two years. A request from 2006 to correct what is claimed to be a confused or patently false district name has been ignored.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Darod, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 14:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for recurring problems with your editing: WP:V/WP:NOR, WP:OWN and WP:AGF. Regarding your edit to Galkacyo ([5]), you haven't supplied any reference(s) to support your assertion about Leelkase in the area. I'll also note that other editors have raised this issue with you, regarding this specific content in this particular article, for at least four years ([6]). This ([7]) is also not the first time you have accused other editors of having a particular bias (in this case, for allegedly belonging to a particular clan), and you've already been warned about it ([8], [9], [10]). And it isn't the first time you've cited your own personal knowledge as being authoritative. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gyrofrog (talk) 15:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gyrofrog, will you now sleep better at night after blocking me on wikipedia?

Will writings on wikipedia ever effect the true reality on the ground, and my tribes ancestrial land of Gaalkacyo? NO!

File:Galdogob city.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Galdogob city.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:15, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]