User talk:Taaaahs722

July 2023

Hello, I'm Skynxnex. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:3PPYB6 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Skynxnex (talk) 04:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 04:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Convenience Stores, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: National Convenience Stores was changed by Taaaahs722 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976435 on 2023-07-24T05:04:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sdrqaz (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Taaaahs722 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Taaaahs722 (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.