User talk:TSA 1903
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, TSA 1903, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Stickburg Stickville & Sticktropolis Railway, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Wikishovel (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Stickburg Stickville & Sticktropolis Railway
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Stickburg Stickville & Sticktropolis Railway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]
Hi TSA 1903! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Stick figure several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Stick figure, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 16:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
You reverted a good edit made to this article and replaced it with a poorly written contribution. Next time please make certain that your contributions are reasonably well written prior to submitting them. Also, please respect Wikipedia's policy against warring. You were reminded of this in June, I see. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 03:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- i will admit my fault in this, as i did misspell a few things here. However, i think you should be self-aware of yourself, as you are quite in the wrong here: looking at your talk page, it seems that you've been in some hot water multiple times for similar actions centered around Various (and sometimes unneeded) edits on Wiki pages. it appears that when something isn't to your exact preference, or things on a page are laid out in a way you feel wrong, you edit them yourself. when people correct your flawed/unnecessary edits, you revert them. you have been reminded of this over the course of several years, i see, yet it appears that you hav faeiled to curb your actions. i will be reverting the edit you made to my page, and i dont want to see it reverted, thank you. TSA 1903 (talk) 00:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- When contributing to Wikipedia, please use capital letters correctly. In English there are rules regarding this. For help, Wikipedia has guidelines for using capital letters. Try to improve your spelling, too. Thank you. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 02:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- will do. however, before correcting others, i suggest you begin working on your own editing skills first. the facts stated in my previous reply are all true, and continuing to critique me whilist refusing to admit your own wrongdoing here is not the best approach for somebody who has a lengthy history of repeatedly making unwanted/unneeded edits to Wiki pages, despite being warned several times. TSA 1903 (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop incorrectly capitalising words, not capitalising words that should be capitalised, misusing periods, misspelling words, and reverting good edits. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 01:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- here you are again, dodging responsibility for your actions. I'm not sure how your revisions and summaries appear to you. They seem excessively rude to me and others a lot of the time. They give off the impression that you want me to know how smart you are and how incompetent everyone else is. If this is the case, you ought to make a sincere effort to improve your level of self-awareness. I discovered that I am not the only one who has reached this conclusion after taking the time (wasted time) to review your rocky and controversial edit record. All of it, to be honest, tells me more about you than either of us should want to know or think. it is unfortunate that you have still failed to acknowledge your wrongdoing and continue to blame it on me. that said, i will be reverting your "Edits" TSA 1903 (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Your August 11 edit to Eastern Railway of Minnesota contained many errors, again the capitalisation and lack of it were often incorrect. I have already encouraged you to improve. Please examine your edits before submitting them. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 03:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- clearly what I have pointed out about you before hasn't gotten through to you, as you are once again refusing to take responsibility for the wrongdoing you have repeatedly committed. I'm not going to continue to argue with somebody who is arrogant, self-centered and unwilling to change their ways despite being called out on numerous occasions. your "corrections" are not corrections, but they are unconstructive vandalism which you keep inflicting on this page. Rather than sound like a broken record, i will leave you with this statement: No matter how many times you Vandalize this page (or as you like to say, "Correct my poor work") I will revert any and all editing you do. When you are ready to start taking responsibility for your actions, as well as improve your editing skills, then maybe, just maybe, I will consider letting your "work" stay on the Eastern Railway's Page. however, I would prefer if you just go away, quit vandalizing this page and stop wasting my time. You can get defensive with me all you want but remember that you're the one who got yourself into this. TSA 1903 (talk) 22:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- clearly what I have pointed out about you before hasn't gotten through to you, as you are once again refusing to take responsibility for the wrongdoing you have repeatedly committed. I'm not going to continue to argue with somebody who is arrogant, self-centered and unwilling to change their ways despite being called out on numerous occasions. your "corrections" are not corrections, but they are unconstructive vandalism which you keep inflicting on this page. Rather than sound like a broken record, i will leave you with this statement: No matter how many times you Vandalize this page (or as you like to say, "Correct my poor work") I will revert any and all editing you do. When you are ready to start taking responsibility for your actions, as well as improve your editing skills, then maybe, just maybe, I will consider letting your "work" stay on the Eastern Railway's Page. however, I would prefer if you just go away, quit vandalizing this page and stop wasting my time. You can get defensive with me all you want but remember that you're the one who got yourself into this. TSA 1903 (talk) 22:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Your August 11 edit to Eastern Railway of Minnesota contained many errors, again the capitalisation and lack of it were often incorrect. I have already encouraged you to improve. Please examine your edits before submitting them. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 03:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- here you are again, dodging responsibility for your actions. I'm not sure how your revisions and summaries appear to you. They seem excessively rude to me and others a lot of the time. They give off the impression that you want me to know how smart you are and how incompetent everyone else is. If this is the case, you ought to make a sincere effort to improve your level of self-awareness. I discovered that I am not the only one who has reached this conclusion after taking the time (wasted time) to review your rocky and controversial edit record. All of it, to be honest, tells me more about you than either of us should want to know or think. it is unfortunate that you have still failed to acknowledge your wrongdoing and continue to blame it on me. that said, i will be reverting your "Edits" TSA 1903 (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- will do. however, before correcting others, i suggest you begin working on your own editing skills first. the facts stated in my previous reply are all true, and continuing to critique me whilist refusing to admit your own wrongdoing here is not the best approach for somebody who has a lengthy history of repeatedly making unwanted/unneeded edits to Wiki pages, despite being warned several times. TSA 1903 (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- When contributing to Wikipedia, please use capital letters correctly. In English there are rules regarding this. For help, Wikipedia has guidelines for using capital letters. Try to improve your spelling, too. Thank you. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 02:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Even without that you were asking for a block, with all that nonsense about supposed complaints against the other user from supposed other editors. Look at yourself first. Drmies (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)