User talk:TRK

Welcome!

Hello, TRK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Fourth Awakening People's Army, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WWGB (talk) 12:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fourth Awakening People's Army

A tag has been placed on Fourth Awakening People's Army requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 12:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

It would appear that you do not intend to edit Wikipedia in any manner consistent with Wikipedia's purpose. If you persist, you will be indefinitely blocked from editing. Rklawton (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are referring to; I only make corrections to incorrect usage of forms of specific words within articles normally. If what you are stating had some frame of reference maybe I would be able to figure out your point of view. I don't know much about this "PAotFA" stuff, nor am I really knowledgeable about whether I posted it, or if someone else did because the page has been deleted. Often, people post stuff about me without asking me for permission first, and you might be confusing me for them, I assume due to your possibly having account permissions not many others have acquired. I will point out though, around or near the date you posted this someone repaired my laptop in a shop with one or more malicious modifications. The repair after that repair removed 4gb in various viruses among other malware. I mention this to give you an idea why I am unsure the origin of the claimed article. Once again, normally all I post is edits to single incorrect forms and/or inflections of words in specific articles. If someone else has been using my account, that is something I need to be alerted to regarding. TRK (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this was the proble[1]. Rklawton (talk) 11:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh crud, that was meant for the talk page for the article. Sorry. TRK (talk) 12:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]