User talk:TRHmTivl

Welcome!

Hi TRHmTivl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Also, when you edit, use Help:Edit summary. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Thomas Christians

Please stop adding photos to Saint Thomas Christians. If they want to see more, they can click on the Wikipedia Commons link and browse. commons:Category:Saint_Thomas_Christians Thank you Adakiko (talk) 09:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those are just few pictures about the traditional clothing and art forms of the community. TRHmTivl (talk) 10:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even I'm a person belonging to this community so I just improved the page by adding what I knew about our customs and traditions.Thank you.Please do consider to keep those pictures. TRHmTivl (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jesus. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 10:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022 edit warring

Your recent editing history at Saint Thomas Christians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Repeated failure to engage in the discussion process and violation of 3RR will often result in a disciplinary action. Please refer to Talk:Saint Thomas Christians and undo your violating edit. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Every single one of your edits seems to be either a violation of copyright law (all your images are falsely labelled as "own work" when they are sourced from Google Maps) or some sort of standards violation (namely WP:3RR). You're a very new editor attempting to perform complex tasks, and I would encourage you to start on smaller projects. There are very helpful guidelines available on this page: Wikipedia:Five pillars. Please reach out if you have questions. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring. Please join the conversation at Talk:Saint Thomas Christians#Image. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TRHmTivl: You have violated the WP:3RR again despite multiple warnings. Please revert your edits on Saint Thomas Christians, as I would be glad to have to discuss the matter further. Additionally, on your draft page, multiple significant issues were discovered—including but not limited to the use of copyrighted text and images. The reintroduction of those things can result in another form of disciplinary action. Please ping me if you have a question about how that works. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TRHmTivl: Please remove the copyrighted sentence from your draft, as well as undo your other edit warring. Additionally, your sources for your draft are very much not WP:Reliable Sources (though making your own Google Docs and claiming they're sources is…clever?). Please remove them and delete the uncited material. Failure to acknowledge these warnings is inappropriate behavior. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AN/EW Notice

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Saint Thomas Christians. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: I would encourage further review of the editor's actions after the block expired, including an edit war on George Alencherry (see diffs 1, 2, 3, 4). ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti: If you believe that TRH violated WP:EW, you should file a report at WP:ANEW. If you believe that the problem is broader than that given the user's history, you should a report at WP:ANI. I have not investigated myself.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Benedict Gregorios, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 03:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 03:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ganesha, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Semen. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Para Brahman, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --WikiLinuz {talk} 🍁 04:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kizhaketheruvu (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HenryTemplo were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kizhaketheruvu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kizhaketheruvu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TRHmTivl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Please stop distruptive edits in Kollanoor page and take consensus in Talk page before distruptive editing Thank you. LNThampi (talk) 03:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This involves you

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_user_continuing_to_be_disruptive Dronebogus (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I noticed that in this edit to Semen, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 08:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has vulgar content.It's only about semen and not about sexual acts and lewd practices done with semen. TRHmTivl (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Semen. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. See wp:NOTCENSORED. If it bothers you, I would suggest avoiding such topics. Adakiko (talk) 08:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Baselios Cleemis. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Serols (talk) 15:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

His actual name is Issac Thottunkal.Thottunkal is his family name I just added it as well.I would be glad in discussing wether to add the family name to it with you.Thank you. TRHmTivl (talk) 15:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kizhaketheruvu (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kizhaketheruvu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kizhaketheruvu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kizhakkevila Mathunny Panicker

I have moved this to draft as there are no referenced or citations and the information can not be verified. Please improve the article before returning to Mainspace.Slywriter (talk) 01:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I just forgot to add it I'll do it right away TRHmTivl (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kizhakkevila Mathunny Panicker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kizhakkevila Mathunny Panicker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

You wrongly included notes stating you had added references and sources to the page following your move of the page from the draft space it had been placed in. Those edits included neither new sources. Only current reference is a link to. a family-made website that contains none of the information on the page. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Slywriter: editor has attempted similar before. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please Don't delete it give me a weeks time and I'll rectify my errors. TRHmTivl (talk) 01:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reach out to me on my talk page; you clearly know a lot about Keralan Christian history and I really want you to succeed, but there is a process to this all. If you need a week to make a page, consider doing it in your sandbox (you can see how I did one myself with this example User:Pbritti/Sandbox/Book of Common Prayer (1662)). The main space is not the place for articles that lack proper attribution, and you should not write your own sources (as you have done previously). I will gladly help research the topic of this article with you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Same reasoning as above. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TRHmTivl: I can see you in real time add material to the blog you set up. Using a blog you have written as a source is equally bad as using Google Docs you wrote as a source (which you attempted on a previous draft). ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs additional sourcing. Currently only a single (repeated) self-published source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 07:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]