User talk:TR34Istanbul

See the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images § Size for further guidance on expanded or reduced image sizes. Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. |thumb|300px), which forces a fixed image width. should be used, thereby respecting the user's base preference (which may have been selected for that user's particular devices). When px is used, the resulting image should usually be no more than 500 pixels tall and no more than 400 pixels wide, for comfortable display on the smallest devices "in common use" (though this may still cause viewing difficulties on some unusual displays). To convert a px value to scaling factor, divide it by 220 and round the result as desired. For example, |150px is roughly equivalent to |upright=0.7 .--Moxy 🍁 23:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Erdoğan's photo.

Now it works, thanks.

Images make Wikipedia more informative, accessible, and professional.

In general, when working with images:

DO:
Review the image style guide and use policy.
Give context with captions and alt text.
Try to find at least one image for each article.
Find free images, or create and upload your own.
Clean up images: crop, color-correct, etc.
Use the best file format for each image.
Use objects for scale where helpful.
Place images in the section to which they are related

DON'T:
Don't upload non-free images.
Don't use images in place of tables or charts.
Don't use images or galleries excessively.
Don't add images that are not relevant.
Don't flip faces, text, or works of art.
Don't set fixed image sizes.
Don't sandwich text between two images.
Don't refer to images by their placement.
Don't place images too early or at the end of sections.

Sources

Hi TR34, please add sources. I agree that it seems that the STC-16 was inspired by the 240Z amongst others, but we need citations. And not just some blogger who thinks that the car looks like an Aston Martin from a certain angle, reputable sources. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it resembles mostly the Datsun 240Z and the Ginetta G21 (the latter was likewise mostly built with yellow paint). From the profile it resembles the Datsun 240Z and from the rear it resembles the Ginetta G21.

Again, our opinions are not really that relevant. I am not interested in reverting you over and over again, but be aware that if you cite your edits and follow the Wikipedia standards then your contributions are more likely to gain some permanence. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://anadolturkey.com/web/en/models/a4.html

https://www.turkiyegazetesi.com.tr/fotogaleri/anadol-stc-bugun-uretilse-nasil-olurdu--4704.aspx?O=4

https://www.raillynews.com/2019/12/The-tasarlandig-turkiyede-sanil-the-domestic-car-Anadol/

Welcome!

Hi TR34Istanbul! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! LouisAragon (talk) 22:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Turkey, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me which detail is wrong, if you are truly honest.

April 2020

Your recent editing history at Turkey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 04:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These are events which defined the borders of present-day Turkey. The Balkan Wars defined Turkey's borders in Europe while Turkey's borders in the Middle East were defined by the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) which superseded the Treaty of Sevrés (1920). The abolition of the Sultanate on 1 November 1922 and the foundation of the Republic on 29 October 1923 are also VERY IMPORTANT details.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Turkey. ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Turkey into Human rights in Turkey. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 16:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020 - repeated edit warring and content removal against consensus.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Turkey. Jeppiz (talk) 12:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yardım

selamlar, türkiye sayfasındaki ermeni soykırımı hakkındaki fotoğrafın kaldırılması için yarıdmına ihtiacım var. kazekagetr 11:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Please read WP:SIGN about how to sign your contributions to talk pages. --T*U (talk) 12:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you again have made a talk page contribution without signing it. I must ask you again to read WP:SIGN and start signing your talk page postings. --T*U (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I seriously recommend that you start signing your posts. Other users could misinterpret your intentions and think that you’re not signing your comments to cause disruption. Regards, Rodrigo Valequez^(🗣) 18:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I demand an IP address comparison

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TR34Istanbul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The claim for blocking me is wrong and absurd. You can't block people based on false assumptions. Simply make a comparison between the IP addresses of User:Shuppiluliuma and User:TR34Istanbul and you'll see that there is no relationship at all. TR34Istanbul (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked based on an assumption; this is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it. If that technical evidence(which only checkusers can view) has led to the wrong conclusion, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why it might do that. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 23:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please share the IP number of User:Shuppiluliuma (first login and last login) and the IP number of User:TR34Istanbul (first login and last login). Otherwise, you aren't telling the truth - which I know, because it's a lie. TR34Istanbul (talk) 17:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This link will be helpful to other checkusers reviewing.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lie, which proves that the "Crusader mentality" is dominant in Wikipedia. My time is too precious to spend for a blatantly racist website which is destined to become "history" like all websites in the end. Thank you for disallowing me to spend in vain my limited time in this world for a "volatile" source which will ultimately be deleted. TR34Istanbul (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]