User talk:TQ

Welcome

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Nadia Styles. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The information you cited as questionable is credible if spoken by Nadia Styles and referenced as such for reader validation. --TQ (talk) 05:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding poorly-referenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nadia Styles. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Youtube is not a reliable source even if the subject is in the video. Biographies should not have any controversial assertions supported by an editor's analysis of a primary source. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is used as a reference on Ron Jeremy's page. It's not editor analysis to reference Nadia Styles' own words. --TQ (talk) 19:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia Styles

Why did you remove a reference and two external links from Nadia Styles? No reason was given. You left it mentioning her Christianity without any reference. Thanks. --TQ (talk) 19:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The citations were questionable imho and same for the externals links. Maybe take this to the article talk page. --Tom 00:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable in what way? Thanks. --TQ (talk) 00:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the pinkcross.org a reliable source? Not sure. youtube links should be avoided as external links. Again, it is probably best to have this discussion on the article talk page so others can weigh in as well.--Tom 14:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:The Pink Cross.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:The Pink Cross.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pink Cross Foundation

The article Pink Cross Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Foundation has no independent notability, only what it inherits from Lubben. Should at best be a redirect, but seems unlikely as a search term for anyone who isn't familiar with her.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Horrorshowj (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Pink Cross Foundation

I have nominated Pink Cross Foundation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Cross Foundation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Horrorshowj (talk) 06:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Thought Quotient? Cindamuse (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Truth Behind the Fantasy of Porn Shelley Lubben.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Truth Behind the Fantasy of Porn Shelley Lubben.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Morbidthoughts (talk) 09:55, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Truth Behind the Fantasy of Porn Shelley Lubben.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Truth Behind the Fantasy of Porn Shelley Lubben.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:01, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pink Cross Foundation logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pink Cross Foundation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]