Jump to content

User talk:TCN7JM/Archive 16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 20
Archive

Archives


123456
7891011
1213141516
Current

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #143

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #144

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #145

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #146

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Center Line: Winter 2015

Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of several of Godot13's quality submissions during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Australia Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #147

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

Hello. You recently wrote "The GAN queue for road articles has been pretty slow recently, and most of the reviews are done within the project. People like you from outside the project reviewing them helps to speed up the queue, while also making sure the articles make sense to people who aren't as knowledgeable on roads". With that in mind, could you pass your expert eye over this article and see what else could be done about it? There are a few bits still unsourced (most of which is not what I'd call "information challenged or likely to be challenged") and it could do with some more political history ... what else, I wonder? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Road articles are my forte, but – being completely unfamiliar with London's political or transportation history – I'm not sure how much I can help with this one aside from a few general/minor things. I can't seem to locate a standards page for WP:UKRD, so I'm not sure if/how the standards for this article differ from other WP:HWY articles (specifically those in WP:USRD, my fortissimo, if you will). Does a normal UKRD junction list look like the one in this article? Finally, a cursory read shows there are units missing conversion templates. I added one in the lead, but there are more yet to be added. TCN7JM 06:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) You said nothing about KML :P --Rschen7754 06:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Another one of the standards I was unsure of. I remember some British editors being adamant about using coordinates a while ago, so while I'd prefer KMLs on all road articles, I don't know if the consensus is for that in the UK. Could you clear it up for me? TCN7JM 07:06, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
If memory serves me right, KML is a worldwide thing, but I don't think it's been done much outside the US/Canada/Australia before. I'll try and think about it, or maybe another talk page stalker can help since it was so long ago... --Rschen7754 07:13, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Well somewhere buried on a hard drive I have some OpenStreetMap osm traces of various bits of the NCR that I can convert to KML I think, depends what people's requirements are? What would be really useful is something with traffic figures, which I have seen done elsewhere on the web. For junctions, a typical GLR traffic bulletin would say something like "heavy queues on the North Circular at the moment eastbound between Brent Cross, that's the A41 and Henlys Corner, that's the A1, due to a broken down lorry in the inside lane", so I'd include all of that (minus the broken down lorry, of course). Regarding transport history, very simply put since WWII there's been no money, Ken Livingstone hates cars and Boris Johnston is more interested in buses, cyclists and taxis. Still, there are a ton of news sources to mine, so plenty of room to add content. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #148

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #149

The Inside Corner : March 15, 2015

What's in the latest edition of WikiProject Baseball's newsletter:

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

Wikidata weekly summary #150