Talk page stalkers are free to respond to any edit made here. I'm fine with general discussion of issues related to Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects here, even if I don't respond. If you post here, I will reply here: I typically ping you in reply, but not always. To make sure you see a response, either watchlist this page or check back later.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Absolutely, old friend and colleague. I hope you're doing well. Wait. Did I see you edit Bolano? DYK that once upon a time I taught 2666? One of the greatest novels ever. Drmies (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bolaño is my favorite author. I'm making my way through 2666 in Spanish now - one of the things that makes him such a master of Spanish prose is his unique ability to use the exact word he means to in every situation. The other thing that's interesting in 2666 from the Spanish prose perspective is because of the unique circumstances of his life, his writing style changes depending on the geography of where he's writing about/the nationality of the characters. In Mexico he writes using Mexican vocabulary. In Spain, he writes like a Spaniard, the Chilean characters speak chileno etc. Its a work of art on so many levels.Re: his article, yes, I was going to try to update his article a bit by translating from the es.wiki article on him( es:Roberto Bolaño.) Main problem is that a lot of the sources are print that aren't easily available in the US and I didn't want to introduce content I didn't have the ability to verify (in part because I'd be translating a summary into a summary in another language, and I feel like there's too much room for error there, even though my Spanish is professional level.) TonyBallioni (talk) 20:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa you are a man of many talents: I bow to your linguistic knowledge. I only read him in English of course, but what you're telling me only impresses me more. What else have I read recently in that area? Among the Lost, a while ago, which I thought was great and terrifying and I should, but don't want to, read it again--it's a really hard read. I was less impressed with his No contar todo. Drmies (talk) 16:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, you blocked risto hot sir (talk·contribs) on 2019 with a reason of "Personal attacks, inability to get the point, blocks on four other wikimedia projects suggest AGF has run out a while ago", they were active for years and currently on more projects, and I decide to submit a global ban request against them. Is there any circumstances for your first block against them on this project? Thank you. -Lemonaka07:16, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
to go with the beer from Drmies. I've been away for a couple of years and on my return I'm dismayed to see that RfA has never changed its spots. I thought that the new monitoring policy was designed to reduce the toxicity, not stoke it. I stand by your comments and I'm glad to see you're still around. It's been a long time. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'm not nearly as active as I used to be, but do stop by from time-to-time. I was pretty surprised to see people think that oppose was a policy violation - I wasn't expecting to have so many edits today... TonyBallioni (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The removal drew more attention to it than the comment would have gotten initially so there’s that. My bigger concern is that they’re just ignoring the emerging consensus that my comment didn’t violate any policy. I took it to their talk page and we’ll see how it goes. Not worth taking to AN, but a big enough concern that it’s worth asking about it on their talk. TonyBallioni (talk) 12:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
