User talk:T2345

cool

every1 on wikipedia is equal, if you are older or have more qualifications it really doesnt mean anything here. That is the real ignorance. Realist2 14:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?????

A) I do respect people, you dont no me, how dare you insult me.
B) Age and qualifications mean nothing on wikipedia.
C) I no more on the subject of Michael Jackson than you I ashume. I am a main contributer on the michael Jackson wikiproject.
D) Your point was deleted because it was never going to have an impact on the main article.

Yours with little or no gratitude Realist2 19:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:hi

Hi T2345, it certainly does appear that he is a huge fan of Michael Jackson, but this should not be a problem if his edits are neutral and properly cited. And, in a way, he is right: if you are older or have more qualifications, that doesn't matter so much on Wikipedia as long as the edits are properly researched and cited. Perhaps the fact that English is not your main language is an issue, but what you said to him on his talk page would be considered insulting if you were in Wikipedia: "You with only 3 A level and being only 19" and "You didn't even exist in 1983; You have years in front of you to learn how to respct people, and why". I have to admit to having some age prejudices, and that I've offended a few Wikipedians by mentioning their age, but I'd like to think I've learned from my past mistakes. That being said, if Realist2 simply removed your discussion from the Talk page without responding on the talk page, that would be a cause for dispute. His reason, "Your point was deleted because it was never going to have an impact on the main article", may or may not be true, but that should be up for discussion to generate consensus. I'll send him a friendly message to see what he thinks about leaving it in, but I am not an expert on Michael Jackson, nor am I a contributor to the Michael Jackson Wikiproject, so I wouldn't know if this is already a subject that has been discussed multiple times. Therefore, I can't guarantee anything. --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's perfectly fine. Sometimes it's the context in which you write things. I personally think that what you wrote is fine for a talk page, though probably a little too detailed and technical to put in the main article without editing. We're not asking you not to edit Wikipedia... in fact, your technical knowledge would be quite valuable. I know there are several areas that would be glad of your knowledge and expertise... take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Science, for example. --Deathphoenix ʕ 13:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

COOL2

I have replied to deathpheniox (ops miss spelt that) , hopefully I wont come accross you again on wikipedia. By the way we no exactly y Michael Jackson`s skin is white, it came out in court during his trial. Leave the "science" for something else.Realist2 00:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don'¨t move your user page into article space

You moved your user page to "Tekla I", which is in the namespace for ordinary articles. Please don't do that - it confuses. I've moved it back. --Alvestrand 19:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub template on user page

Hi T2345. I hope you don't mind that I subst'ed the stub template on your user page and removed the category link; I did this so that your page doesn't turn up in a category of articles for editors to expand.

NeilN 03:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]