User talk:Syoungnz
The contributions of Strawberryphoebe seem to have been written by a Chinese student in Wellington crying out for recognition and have no place in an article on Chinese New Zealanders because what is said is either trivial, unverifiable or a naive protest against the establishment, and as a contribution is just not up to standard. I reverted the contribution to restore the article but Queen Rhana for some reason thinks my effort is vandalism and reverted it. Why
May 2009
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Queen Rhana. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 20:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Taken back, I was reverting your edit to her talk page not the edit to the other content you mention. Thanks for giving me a heads up. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 20:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
I would like to know
[edit]Why Queen Rhana and e0steven think my perfectly serious deletion of nonsense in an article Chinese New Zealander is treated as vandalism and being reverted. Syoungnz (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
You should have said so in the edit summary. >.> You shouldn't remove content without a given reason. You could have said the post before was vandalism. If it suits you, then I'll go warn the other person. I removed your edit. Please remember next time to use the edit summary. ~Rhana~{♦} talk page 21:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)