User talk:Symbolic by Nature

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clifford Preston (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clifford Preston.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Symbolic by Nature, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Speedy deletion nomination of Rob McConnell (media personality)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rob McConnell (media personality) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 03:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi Symbolic by Nature, please note that I have unfortunately reverted your edits to Julia Voth. When editing biography articles it is imperative that we use the best sources available - preferably secondary sources (e.g. newpaper articles) known for editorial oversight and fact-checking. Tertiary sources (e.g. compedia-type websites such as zimbio, famouspeoplewhy, and IMdB) do not meet the reliable sourcing criteria, which is why your edits have been reverted. If after reviewing the guidelines for reliable sources you are still unsure as to whether a particular source is considered reliable, please feel free to ask the opinion of other editors at the help desk or the reliable sources noticeboard, or leave me a message on my talk page. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clifford Preston concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clifford Preston, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clifford Preston

Hello Symbolic by Nature. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Clifford Preston".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clifford Preston}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]