User talk:SylvioGreene

This account is a sockpuppet of Creamy3 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, SylvioGreene, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Laurinavicius (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New message at Laurinavicius' talk page

Hello, SylvioGreene. You have new messages at Laurinavicius's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of A Haunting (film)

The article A Haunting (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and reliable sources have not been given to establish notability of a film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 21:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Haunting (film) notability

Hi SylvioGreene. You gave some rationale for notability of the film, but no reliable sources have been given to establish this notability. Can you find some reliable and verifiable sources to back it up? A quick search didn't turn up any. tedder (talk) 22:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to think that the IMDb has some credibility in these matters. SylvioGreene (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples and Wikipedia:Citing IMDb, you can cite IMDB, but can't use it for notability. This is because it's trivial to create something on IMDB, so it doesn't assert notability. Instead, see WP:GNG: "a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". BTW, one option is for me to userify the article. You can then continue to work on it, then move it back to the mainspace when it has satisfied the notability criteria. tedder (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why creating something on IMDb is trivial, they won't put anything on there unless it has been accepted into a film festival or is available to the public, which A Haunting is. SylvioGreene (talk) 22:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's something you could take up at WP:RSN. However, if that's the only source of claimed notability, it wouldn't met WP:GNG anyhow, and might not meet WP:NF. tedder (talk) 22:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well then I suppose we can look into userifying the article. SylvioGreene (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an admin, I'd be happy to do it. You want me to do it now? tedder (talk) 22:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess so. SylvioGreene (talk) 22:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Here it is: User:SylvioGreene/A Haunting (film). When you feel it is ready to go, ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films to confirm the notability so it can be moved back to mainspace. If they don't get back to you, feel free to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon, though it is probably outside our expert area. tedder (talk) 22:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Amanda Warren, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Amanda Warren was moved to User:SylvioGreene/Amanda Warren by SylvioGreene (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-11-08T23:21:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]