User talk:SylhetiEditor

January 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Sylheti Nagri. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not remove maintenance tags like you did here. Also refrain from personal attacks like this. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fylindfotberserk,

Take it easy mate. We have raised our concern, about misleading page title which already changed. Nothing personal. You are doing a good job, keep it up! SylhetiEditor (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Always remember to follow Wikipedia rules. A longstanding name can't be changed without discussion at talk first. Experienced editors typically enforce that rule, which new editors think to be an act against their preferred version. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, SylhetiEditor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Go through the links on how Wikipedia works. And do not make personal attacks towards me or any other, who are just here maintaining WP:STATUSQUO. You'll get reported. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:28, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SylhetiEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not experienced on Wikipedia concensus & now they fixed, I was concerned by changing all suffixes to Indian language. But didn't mean to attack him

Decline reason:

Nothing here convinces me your edits if unblocked would be substantially different from your existing edits. Yamla (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SylhetiEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will edit further accordingly Wikipedia guidelines SylhetiEditor (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The SPI revealed a third account which you did not declare. You also have not addressed the reason for your block. MER-C 16:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please can you provide an example of an edit you would make should you be unblocked? stwalkerster (talk) 22:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look, even though I am a new in Wikipedia but I came here to contribute. Even though that particular conversation was not good. They have also created a page based on my information. And very few people like me know about the script. Because its an endangered script. This page is made after I added the info. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/List_of_works_written_in_Sylheti_Nagri SylhetiEditor (talk)

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SylhetiEditor. Have you anything to say about the allegations?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I replied today in talk by SylhetiUser is my account. SylhetiEditor (talk) 15:48, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No proxy used. SylhetiEditor (talk) 16:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't block the IP it will effect others. It is not proxy. Kindly unblock my account "SylhetiEditor". Thanks. SylhetiEditor (talk) 16:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Rajputro.nagaland (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've revoked your access to this page. You persist in being disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]