User talk:Sylent
Nathan Bedford Forrest High School
[edit]I'm not vandalizing the Nathan Bedford Forrest High School article i'm trying to bring a more neuteral point of view to the article. The article should mention that it is black students that are behind the push to rename the school after one of their leaders. Reading it how it is now you would think that the move has the support of white students or was jointly organized by them when it is not. Also "African-American" in reference to blacks is NPOV. It is a PC phrase and unnaceptable. Black or Negro would be a neuteral term. Please don't use threats of censorship to massage a pro-black viewpoint. Whites have rights as well including keeping the excellent naming of their high school, despite blacks trying to take it over. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YourPTR! (talk • contribs) 06:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
The very fact that negroes are trying to change the name of a school founded and named by whites to one of their so called "civil rights" African heroes is proof that negroes are trying to take over America. YourPTR! 19:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Revert
[edit]Nice quick revert Crested Penguin 06:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I guess that's a compliment... Thanks :) --Sylent 07:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
You
[edit]You are not a beneficial user. Leave wikipedia please.
It's too bad that you're a vandal. Go back and cry to your mommy. --Sylent 02:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Reverting vandalism
[edit]Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism to my user page. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 07:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
No problem! Anything for another editor! ^_^ --Sylent 07:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Aw, come on!
[edit]—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.50.104.155 (talk) 08:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
This was not vandalism. I removed that because I have decided to remove the question from the talk page. I have chosen not to go into a long debate about that, and therefore chose to remove it from the talk page. Please understand and don't revert this again. Ksy92003 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
- It's quite alright. To be honest, when I deleted it, I didn't think anybody would think of that as vandalism. But anyway, all's good and well now. Ksy92003 15:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
About page blanking
[edit]Just a heads-up: if the author blanks a page that only s/he has edited, it's not vandalism and shouldn't be reverted - it should be tagged with {{db-author}} instead (check history before tagging). :) --Coredesat 13:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I think I got a little too zealous; I usually see that. Sorry! --Sylent 14:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's all right, it's an honest mistake. --Coredesat 14:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Warnings
[edit]FYI, I already blocked him. Regards, alphachimp 00:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Er, sorry about the revert of Skin. I was trying to click something else! ... discospinster talk 03:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Bengal Cat
[edit]Actually, i did do that, i was not signed in. The username is Yeyosmoka21, but i did that for a reason. it's in the discussion section.
Clearfelling
[edit]Your script just un-did four paragraphs of work on the clearfelling article just because I deleted one short incongruous paragraph. What is up with that? 66.41.66.213 06:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, my fault, go ahead and restore it.--Sylent 06:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay, cools.66.41.66.213 06:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Carshalton
[edit]Hi, can I ask why you reverted the anonymous edit on 22:53 9 March? It looks OK to me. |The ones after that would have been better to revert! Regards -Rodge 09:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, regards --Rodge 20:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikimedia Pennsylvania
[edit]Hello there!
I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
- Contact us on IRC at
#wikimedia-pa - Join our mailing list
- Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com
Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 04:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Sylent
[edit]Dear sylent, thank you for your help with Talk: Nur Ali Elahi, that person always deletes and vandalizes all the information on the talk page of both Nur Ali Elahi and Ostad Elahi. He also keeps redirecting the Nur Ali Elahi name to Ostad Elahi. Thanks--Persianhistory2008 16:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Did you mistakenly restore this vandalism or do you have some purpose in it? All 199.198.220.100's recent contributions have been similar vandalism. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I see. I guess neither one of us restored the article correctly. I think I've repaired it now. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Macquarie University
[edit]You have just identified some changes that I have made to the Macquarie Univeristy Site as vandalism. I work at Macquarie University and we have identified many inaccuracies and errors on the site and after much consultation and work have moved to correct these. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Janinevdt (talk • contribs) 00:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Macquarie University
[edit]Thanks very much. I'll make sure I explain the reason in the edit summary next time. I will be making changes to the entire Macquarie University wiki site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Janinevdt (talk • contribs) 00:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Sylent! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 338 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Jacob Hester - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
You're invited to the Philadelphia Wiknic!
[edit]
This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area this Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 5 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together in the Azalea Garden, just behind the Philadelphia Museum of Art 39°58′05″N 75°10′59″W / 39.96801°N 75.183156°W
Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.
If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.
Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!
Smallbones (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Vidal Hazelton for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vidal Hazelton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidal Hazelton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 02:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)