User talk:Syed89

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abu Dharr al-Ghifari have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abu Dharr al-Ghifari was changed by Syed89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956244 on 2021-08-29T15:51:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Salman the Persian. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salman the Persian was changed by Syed89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952398 on 2021-08-29T15:55:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Muawiya, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Muawiya was changed by Syed89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877001 on 2021-08-29T15:57:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Syed89, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Syed89! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Lal Shahbaz Qalandar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MoonlightVector 16:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MoonlightVector: Could you show me the dif for the defamatory content? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mushkil kusha (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jack Frost was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mushkil kusha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mushkil kusha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jack Frost (talk) 09:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Syed89. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 10:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Blocked

I have indefinitely blocked you for disruptive editing, including edit-warring across multiple articles, continued (from before) addition of unsourced content, and incompetence. You were blocked just a few days ago, and as soon as that block expired, you resumed the same activity that triggered the block. I see no path for you to become an asset to this project. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock i think i need to quit wikipedia Syed89 (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to leave a message warning you about your edit warring at Aisha‎, but since you have been blocked...-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to calm down and learn from your mistakes. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE Give Me One Chance. Syed89 (talk) 13:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to appeal your block, copy this template and give a reason: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. I suggest that you read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks slowly and carefully before you try to explain why you should be given another chance. If I were in your position, I would read it three times, because it is easy to miss important points.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where to paste? Syed89 (talk) 14:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And yeah can you also tell me why you were going to warn me I provide Source in Aisha then why? Syed89 (talk) 14:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1 ? Syed89 (talk) 16:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the document I suggested that you read, you will know the answer.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And what about 2nd Question? Syed89 (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bad sources will cause a warn. MoonlightVector 17:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But Its a Trusted And Accurate Source.☹ Syed89 (talk) 17:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You used a primary source MoonlightVector 17:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 47614

UTRS appeal #47614 has been closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blcok evasion

Noting for the record

Syed New (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

was blocked as a block-evading sock of this editor. I think we're done with this editor. DMacks (talk) 19:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]