User talk:Swpb/Archive/2011

License tagging for File:Odditiesfish.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Odditiesfish.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Experimental Assembly of Structures in EVA and Assembly Concept for Construction of Erectable Space Structures

An article that you have been involved in editing, Experimental Assembly of Structures in EVA and Assembly Concept for Construction of Erectable Space Structures has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. --GW… 22:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

List of atheists

Swpb, I think the reorganization of the politics list was a good move. Regarding the rename of the list, though, I'm wondering if you were intending on renaming all of the similar lists as they follow a pattern. See List of atheists. Thanks.Griswaldo (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Rolling on...

Thanks very much for your recent and prolific edits to Rotating_locomotion_in_living_systems! Mokele (talk) 19:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

I second that! Thank you for that article. It really shows how great Wikipedia is and should be!

--Qwerty0 (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Notability for high schools

Hi Swpb. I don't doubt for a moment your GF in listing a high school at AfD. However, a quick look at your editing history may demonstrate that you possibly missed WP:NHS which wasn't posted until 2008. In fact I may have been guilty of PRODING or AfDing high schools in my distant past too ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please use edit summaries to explain your edits. This is particularly important when putting PROD tags on articles. Thanks.--Michig (talk) 06:16, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Rotating locomotion in living systems

Hi Swpb. Thank you for nominating Rotating locomotion in living systems as a good article. I conducted a review of it here. I enjoyed reading the article and realize the work that has gone into it, but unfortunately I am unable to pass it. I have left some explanations at the review page. My major concern was with that it was not written like an encyclopaedic article and reads more like an essay. If you believe my review has been faulty then you may ask for it to be reassessed. Regards AIRcorn (talk) 07:57, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

I am fine with the fact that you are not happy with the review. However, I think that a community reassessment through WP:GAR would have been a better approach. However, another editor has already commented so I will let the second opinion run for a while. I don't really know what it will achieve though. I am unwilling to pass the article as it is so a strong consensus that is is a good article will be needed for me to change my mind. If you want a new reviewer it would be easier to let the article fail and then re-nominate it, maybe even with a note at the Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations page. AIRcorn (talk) 05:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

NPVIC

Hi Swpb, I appreciate the effort you have put into creating the graph in the NPVIC article. However, I am troubled by the false vertical scale. While you have made clear that there is indeed a gap there, the fact remains that with this scaling, the progress looks far more impressive than it really is. I think that as soon as somebody comes by who doesn't like the idea of the NPVIC, they will want this graph removed. Therefore I urge you to put in a real scale. (Let's hope California approves the compact soon...) KarlFrei (talk) 08:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Smithsonian Archives of American Art Backstage Pass

Archives of American Art Backstage Pass! - You are invited!

The Smithsonian is hosting its first Backstage Pass at the Archives of American Art in, Washington, D.C., on Friday, July 29. 10 Wikimedians will experience the behind the scenes aspects of archiving the world's largest collection of documents and photographs related to American art. After a complimentary lunch, an edit-a-thon will take place and prizes will be awarded. Followed by an evening happy hour. We hope you'll participate! SarahStierch (talk) 17:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

ICES

Hi Swpb, I did some changes to the ICES page you created. Would you like to check if everything is OK for you? Thanks, --Andrea.gf (talk) 12:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rotating locomotion in living systems

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Rotating locomotion in living systems you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 12:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Replied. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 18:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations!

	New GA!
	The article Rotating locomotion in living systems that you nominated for GA status has passed! Well done! Puffin Let's talk! 10:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

FilmCrave was undeleted

Just to let you know, FilmCrave, an article you proposed for deletion, was undeleted today, after a request at WP:UNDELETE and discussion at User talk:Athaenara#FilmCrave. —C.Fred (talk) 02:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Swpb! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)