User talk:Swmmr1928

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Moonlight Proteins. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant ^talk 23:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Swmmr1928 (talk) 01:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Swmmr1928. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 01:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Reply Alpha Quadrant ^talk 02:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Reply again Alpha Quadrant ^talk 03:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Moonlight Proteins

Hello Swmmr1928, I was wondering what the current status of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Moonlight Proteins is. According to the edit history it has not been edited in 10 days. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant ^talk 05:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Swmmr1928. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 17:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I have reinstated the hold on the article. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 17:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Swmmr1928. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 14:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Reply Alpha Quadrant ^talk 14:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply again. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 03:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 15:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied. Apologies for the later reply, I haven't checked Wikipedia today until now. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 23:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Swmmr1928. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 22:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tables!

**Comparison of macroscopic and microscopic components** *add reference here*
Technology	Function	Molecular example(s)
Struts, beams, casings	Transmit force, hold positions	Microtubules, cellulose, mineral structures
Cables	Transmit tension	Collagen
Fasteners, glue	Connect parts	Intermolecular forces
Solenoids, actuators	Move things	Conformation-changing proteins, actin/myosin
Motors	Turn shafts	Flagellar motor
Drive shafts	Transmit torque	Bacterial flagella
Bearings	Support moving parts	Sigma bonds
Containers	Hold fluids	Vesicles
Pipes	Carry fluids	Various tubular structures
Pumps	Move fluids	Flagella, membrane proteins
Conveyor belts	Move components	RNA moved by fixed ribosome (partial analog)
Clamps	Hold workpieces	Enzymatic binding sites
Tools	Modify workpieces	Metallic complexes, functional groups
Production lines	Construct devices	Enzyme systems, ribosomes
Numerical control systems	Store and read programs	Genetic system

Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Ocaasi ^c 05:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination for Moonlighting protein

Hi. Concerning promoting the Moonlighting protein to good article status, I think we are getting close, but it will require more work. In particular, Italienmoose (talk · contribs) has stated "of the well documented examples of moonlighting proteins causing disease, there is only one example provided" and I concure that the clinical significance section needs expansion. In addition, Ruhrfisch (talk · contribs) has also listed some very helpful suggestions that should be addressed. I have already addressed some of the suggestions, but there are remaining issues that need to be addressed. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before nominating this article for GA status, I think we should seriously consider merging Gene sharing into Moonlighting protein. This is a loose end that is likely to be raised in the GA review. In addition Ruhrfisch (talk · contribs) questioned whether the article is comprehensive/long enough. Merging in the material from Gene sharing which has a fairly extensive discussion of crystallin proteins would go a long way of improving the comprehensive of the moonlighting article. Boghog (talk) 10:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My instructor and my group is opposed to a merge for 2 weeks. Seehttp://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Moonlighting_protein#MergeSwmmr1928 talk 02:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then I think nominating this article for GA status will also need to be put on hold. Boghog (talk) 04:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Swmmr1928! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 19:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Re: Infobox vs. sidebar

Infoboxes are the right-aligned elements at the top of many articles that feature an image and things like the name of a video game, the occupation of a person, or the date a work was completed, et al. I use the term "sidebar" to refer to the project-specific element to the right of the talk page on WT:VG. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]