User talk:Swimflower
Swimflower, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Swimflower! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC) |
December 2016
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pencak Silat has been reverted.
Your edit here to Pencak Silat was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAo8gQcYGUg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Swimflower (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why block me? you can check my edits, and wrong report block
Decline reason:
You are blocked for the misuse of multiple accounts - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rowingasia/Archive. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Swimflower (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have one acount and i am new user, anyone of accounts that you think, isnt mine. check my ip and compare
Decline reason:
This has been done; you are confirmed as having multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
you not check ip and isnt same ip for me and your user rowingasia! i havent any problem edit and all of my edit is useful. you can see show my mistake? unblocked me, thanks.
Swimflower (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why block me? you can check my edits, and wrong report block. you not check ip and isnt same ip for me and your user rowingasia! i havent any problem edit and all of my edit is useful. you can see show my mistake? unblocked me, thanks. if one user was blocked, she or he must be blocked forever?
Decline reason:
This is a checkuser block; the check which you suggest has been done, and confirms your use of multiple accounts. Incidentally, if Rowingasia was not you, how would you know their IP? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
because of i am new user and havent account in wikipedia, if you think i am vandalist , you can show me my vandal edits? can u show me same my ip and other sock user? pls show me, show me , my vandal user and my IP socks. you can review my edits.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Swimflower (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
because of i am new user and havent account in wikipedia, if you think i am vandalist , you can show me my vandal edits? can u show me same my ip and other sock user? pls show me, show me , my vandal user and my IP socks. you can review my edits.
Decline reason:
Posting a semi-incoherent request does not help you; it merely raise the question of your competence. In your next request you must address the question of your use of multiple accounts, or you may lose the ability to edit on this page. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Swimflower (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have discussed with administrators but I do not understand what you want of me? now, i am understand why this is a problem and are now committed to constructive editing using just "one" account. if in first your admind friendly and completely explain to me and blocked me with expire time, i am not creat another account. Now how can have an one unblocked account? i cant send apeel block because i send many in past but havent any results.I have discussed with administrators but I do not understand what you want of me? now, i am understand why this is a problem and are now committed to constructive editing using just "one" account. if in first your admind friendly and completely explain to me and blocked me with expire time, i am not creat another account. Now how can have an one unblocked account? i cant send apeel block because i send many in past but havent any results.first of all, english isnt my first language and i cant release all of your text or all of your mean? What should I do exactly?pls speak simple english! account creat reason is clear : unjustic block and Lack of my appeals and the reasons in past. all of this account blocked by admind related to rowingasia isnt mine. many wrong blocked by other user by wrong report by mohsen 1248 because he have a big conflict and war with "Parsa Amoli" that unrelated me ( My documents exist at the following links there). my block relate to one year ago. in past and relate my first account , in time, i dont know rules of wikipedia in multi account and edits and insert refrenceand copyrhit and so on. mohsen 1248 wrong report (parsa amoli ) and her friend unjustic support GAB , he blocked me without expire time!!!!!!!!!!!! after this i creat a few account (not a big list rowingasia - wrong report by Mohsen1248)Although all of my next edit better and better and constructive. other explain in my user talk page because exist one error. you can askkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk my edits from two user : 1- Montell 74 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Montell_74 ---/2- Sillyfolkboy https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Sillyfolkboy -////////////thanks . i can help to improve wikipedia specially sport eventssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss. best regards (more documents for my text in my user talk page because of have an error for type in this box) one sample my usefull edit that deleted by Mohsen 1248 because of personl wrong problem : in user talk
Decline reason:
Your ability to edit this page has been withdrawn for repeatedly failing to demonstrate the necessary level of written English required to improve this encyclopedia. MER-C 12:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
one sample my usefull edit that deleted by Mohsen 1248 because of personl wrong problem All Time Table: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=WAFF_Championship&action=history
what is your mean? https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rowingasia/Archive&oldid=757588590 - i and SFB 15:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC) explain all of them. why all of report by mohsen 1248? because he think i am another user that unrelatede me and confrimed by other admins! this explain: one year ago i am enter to wikipedia. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rowingasia/Archive this user : MOhsen 1248 have a conflict to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/%D9%BE%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%A7_%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%84%DB%8C ------------- he was think i am this user. he put on delet markers in my useful page and delet my useful edit. he is perform a lie and hate report to admins. i was blocked for have 2 account. one acount is unused! not confirmed me and he (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/%D9%BE%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%A7_%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%84%DB%8C). only lie report by mohsen1248 i am block!!!!! this conflict go on in 1 year. can u help me? so funny block because mohsen1248 and GAB are friends. i add many usefull content to above pages (Asian Sambo Championships, Asia Masters Athletics Championships, Asian Zurkhaneh Sports Championship, and Asian Armwrestling Championship) but Mohsen1248 deleted all of them and in results i am blocked!! it is justic! ? you can help me. montell know all of them. you can speak with he thanks my dear Swimmiggold (talk) 07:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
other user explain: @Swimmiggold: I've moved your comments for better visibility - the main reason for you being blocked is your use of multiple accounts and past disruptive editing. To get unblocked, you will need to prove that you understand why this is a problem and are now committed to constructive editing using just one account. You are not helping yourself by constantly creating new accounts, as these will be automatically blocked and all your edits reversed even where the edits may be constructive (as seen above). Thanks. SFB 15:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC) Montell (another user defend me) in mohsen 1248 user talk page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Mohsen1248 Your "sockpuppet war"
Your work against this guy ist just about deletion of his edits - in all cases. There is no creation of a kind of conversation with this guy to give a helping hand. Ok, some of his edits might be for discussion and not helpful, but not all!, f.e. most of statistics. And yes, it is necessary to motivate people.Montell 74 (talk) 18:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
First, you should know why this is guy is blocked indef in first place, I wasn't even involved. when admins blocked him indef it means he should not be here. You are motivating him to create hundred accounts in a day. you should see the outcome, he is obviously ruining the pages. I'm not removing those stats because I don't like him, only because I don't think they should be in that article, he is making articles crazy big for unnecessary reasons, for example in sport of weightlifting, team ranking means almost nothing and it's not a notable thing to be in the main article at all. Mohsen1248 (talk) 18:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Yes, articles growing bigger and sometimes too big. But often it is just to find a consensus, to delete or create a new article. I don't have an overview about all his crazy output, but i try to take a look at and i miss this try on your side. This kind of "conversation" (ignoring and deletion) is reason for his situation to create new accounts. If you would motivate him, he just would need only one account.
You wrote that team ranking is not useful on weightlifting sites. Why? Every championships has this ranking. And his work gives a complete overview about leading countries at championships in the past. Also formatting of the edition table was not bad or do you like to scroll down long tables with small width?Montell 74 (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
And, yes, what about the alleged connection to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی? Did you check? Vanjagenije (talk) 21:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
I didn't know there was an alleged connection. In any event, the master and socks here are """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Unrelated"""""""""""""""""""""""""" to the accounts confirmed by DoRD on January 4, 2016, e.g., Callderon (talk · contribs · count).--Bbb23 (talk) 02:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)