User talk:SwaggedOutGurllz

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fenstanton Primary School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fenstanton Primary School was changed by SwaggedOutGurllz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97524 on 2011-11-01T18:17:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Fenstanton Primary School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 18:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fenstanton Primary School

Hi... Your addition to the article on Fenstanton Primary School is not written as an encyclopedia entry. It reads as an advertising narrative. Content in Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view. Thanks for the contribution to the encyclopedia! Please ensure that the information you add is factual and verifiable. Thanks! Wikipelli ^Talk 18:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]