User talk:SwabiVal'

Welcome!

Hello, SwabiVal', and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like European Board of Urology, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! StewartNetAddict (talk) 19:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of European Board of Urology

A tag has been placed on European Board of Urology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. StewartNetAddict (talk) 19:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated

A tag has been placed on The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 21:32, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thesis (Uromanometer), Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 1982-06-14jpg.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thesis (Uromanometer), Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 1982-06-14jpg.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Admrboltz (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thesis (Uroflowmeter), Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 1981-12-17jpg.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thesis (Uroflowmeter), Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 1981-12-17jpg.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Admrboltz (talk) 00:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated

I have nominated The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Marghuz Va'li Illustrated. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Favonian (talk) 12:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello SwabiVal, I can see you're obviously quite enthusiastic about editing, but have run into some obstacles over articles you've created and files uploaded. I'd strongly encourage you to take your time, familiarize yourself with some of the basic Wikipedia policies, and then look at other articles to get an idea of how things work. If you are interested in Marghuz, why not try to expand the article on the town (here) while using more developed and mature articles (like Islamabad) as a guide. Joshdboz (talk) 01:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Development of Uromanometer, Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 14.06.1982jpg.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Development of Uromanometer, Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 14.06.1982jpg.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Development of Uroflowmeter, Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 17.12.1981jpg.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Development of Uroflowmeter, Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 17.12.1981jpg.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Sole Non-European EAU Support Fund Award, Paris, France, 2006-04-05 jpg.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Sole Non-European EAU Support Fund Award, Paris, France, 2006-04-05 jpg.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:28, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Swabi District

Please see the discussion here. Thanks.02:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Pleas familarizer yourself with Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Your use of capitalization, numbers, the ampersand, and other minor issues required clean up.Cptnono (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And please do not sign your contributions on an article page or in the edit summary! Signatures with ~~~~ are for talk pages only. De728631 (talk) 22:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Village Marghuz

Please do not continue to add biographies of local personalities that have no substantial value for an encyclopedia like Wikipedia! I have reviewed your article about Marghuz and instead of a description of the village and its geographical features I found it to be a very promotional piece about local leaders who are not notable under Wikipedia criteria. JC Bose having spent a night in your village is also not an event that needs to be noted in an encyclopedia. I have redirected your article to Marghuz, which existed before. If you would like to contribute to Wikipedia, please stick to expanding this article with geographical facts. And please do not repeat your lists of personalities who hail directly from Marhghuz unless they have their own, verified article on Wikipedia. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

WP:IMAGE and WP:CAPTION. Any images need to compliment the text. Your captions are too long. You have also disregarded the advice given up above. Please adhere to the style guidelines.Cptnono (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (QEA-01) jpg..JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (QEA-01) jpg..JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:22, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (EAU SF-01) jpg.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (EAU SF-01) jpg.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:22, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (MMAJ-01) jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (MMAJ-01) jpg.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (QEA-02) jpg..JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (QEA-02) jpg..JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (ECP-01) jpg.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Prof. Dr. Taskeen Ahmad Khan (ECP-01) jpg.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NorthernPashtun (talk) 13:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]