User talk:Svpnikhil

This is Svpnikhil's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Svpnikhil, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for registering an account.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay.


	Introduction 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help Tips	How to write a great article Manual of Style Be Bold Assume Good faith Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC.
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #74967[edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Svpnikhil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a paid editor. I want to access my account.Svpnikhil (talk) 08:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to do as you have been asked above and be completely transparent here as to any connection you have with Mr. Kumar, how you came to edit about him, and if you are working with others to do so(which you kinda described above). I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Peddi Ramarao[edit]

Hello, Svpnikhil. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peddi Ramarao".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Svpnikhil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello reviewer, I took some time to review the policies the administrators that reviewed my work on the article 'PV Sunil Kumar' so far referenced and after deliberations with neutral third-parties, I realized what I missed in my previous appeals. Here I present the sequence of events as my memory best serves: On Jun 08 2023, a friend of a friend ("Wikipradical") reached out to me requesting assistance with an article they were having trouble with getting accepted into Wikipedia. With only an intention to help an individual contribute to Wikipedia, I set out to edit their draft which at the time was placed in 'Articles For Deletion' space. I have no affiliation and no relation to this 'PV Sunil Kumar' and all statements made in the draft at the time were cross-checked by me using the URLs provided in the same draft. I'm not associated with either pv sunil kumar or wikipradical. Reflecting on that last statement, now I admit that I set out to write about someone that I myself do not know of to judge if content on them meets Wikipedia guidelines for notability. I am not aware either of the relationship between this 'PV Sunil Kumar' and the friend of a friend ("Wikipradical"). Stating that, now I commit to enquiring any possibilities for 'Conflicts of Interest' when I run into requests like this in the future. I now realize that despite my intentions to enhance the knowledge base that Wikipedia is, the content I tried to assist with does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability. Thereafter, on 10 Jun 2023, "Sock puppetry" concerns were raised with an administrator blocking my account. I focused too much on the term ("Sockpuppetry") in preparing my responses on 13 Jun 2023 and on another term used ("multiple accounts") in preparing my responses on 18 Jun 2023. At both times, I did not attend to the administrator's basic questions and hence this response. I believe I have disclosed all relevant information that helps explain the suspicion of sockpuppetry. I declare that there is no paid-for work performed and all editing was done in good faith. In case you determine additional information/disclosures are required, please let me know. Once the ban is lifted, for content related to 'PV Sunil Kumar' and anyone/anything else, just as I do for my own contributions, I'll do my due diligence before accepting any requests for creation/edits from others. I've always responded to administrators'/moderators' queries and hereafter I'll also enquire from that perspective when someone else like "Wikipradical" reaches out to me instead of just resubmitting their content. I appreciate the time you spent reviewing this response. Thanks Svpnikhil (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for email, your request will be reviewed by an independent admin Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Account blockage[edit]

@Jimfbleak After 3 months of appealing against account block, today my request was procedurally declined now citing lack of time for admins to read comments . Can you suggest any forums so that I can forward this issue to other admins. Svpnikhil (talk) 13:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know of nothing else. I think you find yourself in this position because despite what you claim, you have not been sufficiently transparent about either a COI or your intentions for editing in future Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Svpnikhil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On COI:

I truly am not aware of the relationship between this 'PV Sunil Kumar' and the friend of a friend ("Wikipradical") who approached for help with editing Wikipedia articles. I do commit to enquiring any possibilities for 'Conflicts of Interest' when I run into requests like this in the future.

On my intentions for editing in future:

I now realize that I tried to assist with content that does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability. Once the ban is lifted, for content related to 'PV Sunil Kumar' and anyone/anything else, just as I do for my own contributions, I'll do my due diligence before accepting any requests for creation/edits from others.Svpnikhil (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am not prepared to unblock you so you can go back to the edit that has been suggested is your conflict of interest. If you want to edit other topics, you should say so in your next unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Account block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Svpnikhil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:PhilKnight Please let me restate my previous response directly addressing the 1 pending question:

On my intentions for editing in future:

I realize that I tried to assist with content that does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability. I'll not touch the content related to 'PV Sunil Kumar' anymore. Once the ban is lifted, for adding/editing any content in Wikipedia, I'll do my due diligence.

Thanks for reconsidering my request. Svpnikhil (talk) 12:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've said what you won't do, but not what you will do. 331dot (talk) 08:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Svpnikhil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear wiki admins/user:Philknight,user:331dot despite my contributions to wp for the past 12 years you still refrained me from editing for a small mistake. I'm a benevolent, loyal wikipedian. I repent for the mistake. I will act more cautiously and judiciously while editing hereafter . Nothing more to say. Please unblock me.Svpnikhil (talk) 11:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear wiki admins/[[user:Philknight]],[[user:331dot]] despite my contributions to wp for the past 12 years you still refrained me from editing for a small mistake. I'm a benevolent, loyal wikipedian. I repent for the mistake. I will act more cautiously and judiciously while editing hereafter . Nothing more to say. Please unblock me.[[User:Svpnikhil|Svpnikhil]] ([[User talk:Svpnikhil#top|talk]]) 11:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear wiki admins/[[user:Philknight]],[[user:331dot]] despite my contributions to wp for the past 12 years you still refrained me from editing for a small mistake. I'm a benevolent, loyal wikipedian. I repent for the mistake. I will act more cautiously and judiciously while editing hereafter . Nothing more to say. Please unblock me.[[User:Svpnikhil|Svpnikhil]] ([[User talk:Svpnikhil#top|talk]]) 11:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear wiki admins/[[user:Philknight]],[[user:331dot]] despite my contributions to wp for the past 12 years you still refrained me from editing for a small mistake. I'm a benevolent, loyal wikipedian. I repent for the mistake. I will act more cautiously and judiciously while editing hereafter . Nothing more to say. Please unblock me.[[User:Svpnikhil|Svpnikhil]] ([[User talk:Svpnikhil#top|talk]]) 11:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}