Jump to content

User talk:Sven Karmanova

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sven Karmanova, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Sven Karmanova! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your input is appreciated

[edit]

Would you like to contribute your thoughts on this page? Thanks!

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Xinjiang_Pages_and_User:Alexkyoung

General Lincoln (talk) 08:27, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

I have blocked this account as an apparent sockpuppet per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexkyoung. Fut.Perf. 09:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your concern, but I am not a sockpuppet. I am willing to cooperate on what steps should be taken to lift this ban.Sven Karmanova (talk) 09:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise Hello is there someone I can talk to to remove this ban? Thanks.Sven Karmanova (talk) 09:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise I am not a sockpuppet. Please this is really unjust. I can't even communicate with anybody now. (talk) 09:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

User:ST47 since you edited my homepage, may I please ask: will this be forever, or can this be lifted? I swear I am no 'sock' and that I don't even know who Alexkyoung is.Sven Karmanova (talk) 09:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sven Karmanova (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been accused by User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise for being an 'apparent sockpuppet' of User:Alexkyoung, but I am not. I apologize for any perceived behavior of disruptive edits that led to the admins to believe that I am a sockpuppet of Alexkyoung, and I will work hard to improve myself and calm down on the rhetoric, especially those involving Russia. Through this block, I've learned that this can get me on the wrong side of the road, and I will do a better job of thinking before I type. I only wish that this association with Alexkyoung be removed because I do not even know who he or she is and was siding with Alex because I thought I finally found a friend on wikipedia. I am German-Russian and not American as Alex claims to be. I can't speak for Alex himself or herself, but I can talk about myself, and I promise to be a better wiki citizen. Thank you for considering my appeal. Sven Karmanova (talk) 09:24, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to request an unblock, you will have to do so from your original account, and explain your use of multiple accounts and proxies in the process. ST47 (talk) 10:02, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sven Karmanova (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have read the appeal page (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) further. I can propose the following steps to make sure this does not happen again. I will not talk to Alexkyoung for at least 2 months; unless there is a very strong reason, I will avoid editing the same pages as Alex. Furthermore, I will try not to mention Russia when debating with others. I will stick to the facts. I am open to further discussions on lifting this ban and convincing admins that I am no sock of Alex. Thanks.Sven Karmanova (talk) 09:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to request an unblock, you will have to do so from your original account, and explain your use of multiple accounts and proxies in the process. ST47 (talk) 10:02, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sven Karmanova (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is my 'original' account, I have one and only one account, and I am no sock. I cannot claim something that I am not.Sven Karmanova (talk) 00:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time as this is a sockpuppetry and/or checkuser block. Check users have access to technical and personally identifying information they may not disclose openly on Wikipedia. Generally, behavioral issues are also a factor in a SPI report. I have reviewed the WP:SPI report as well as your edits. I see no reason to doubt the results. Please read and heed the relevant sections of the WP:GAB.   Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.