Jump to content

User talk:Susannah Tombs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Susannah Tombs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

[edit]

I am thinking of creating a new article and am unsure about whether it fits the notability and conflict of interest guidelines. I am on the steering group of a network practising and explaining a Quaker meditation practice: the Experiment with Light. There about 60 groups in the UK and world-wide using the practice regularly.(Probably about 4-500 people?) It was started in 1996. There are two books published on the practice, the most recent in 2008, by multiple authors. There is a PhD thesis on the practice. There are few internet references. Most references are by practitioners of the meditation.

I am confident I can write about it in an objective neutral fashion, but the notability is more problematic. Any advice? Susannah Tombs (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you create a draft of the article in your user space - see Help:Userspace draft for how to do that. Then you can take your time over it and ask for comments (e.g. at WP:Requests for feedback) without the risk of it being prematurely deleted.
As far as COI goes, read Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. As long as you declare your interest and accept advice from uninvolved users, there shouldn't be problem.
For notability, that is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people independent of the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about?
Also be aware of Wikipedia's WP:No original research and WP:Verifiability policies: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source".
I have added a Welcome message above which has useful links. WP:Your first article is a good introduction, and worth reading carefully. You may find User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard helpful
Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Experiment with Light, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Experiment with Light, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Experiment with Light

[edit]

Hello, Susannah Tombs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Experiment with Light".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander (talk) 02:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Experiment with Light has been accepted

[edit]
Experiment with Light, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]