User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February

Evidence submission over length

The Arbitration Committee has asked that evidence presentations be kept to around 1000 words and 100 diffs. Your presentation is over 1000 words and stands at about 1400 words by my calculation. Please edit your section to focus on the most relevant evidence and bring your word count down to at or under 1000 words. If you wish to submit over-length evidence, you must first obtain the agreement of the arbitrators by posting a request on the /Evidence talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

My main evidence is below 1000 words. The rebuttals to Valereee and GPinkerton should be subtracted from the count. Please clarify if this is incorrect. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The arbitrators have granted you an extension to cover your statement as is at 1,500 words. You may request further extensions if you so need. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Tell Abyad quotes

The quotes portray it as a fact what happened. Which is just not true and is discussed at length on the talk page. I advise you to self-revert as this will come up in the ArbCom Case on Kurds and Kurdistan. I agree that they were accused, no problem, but that's it. Latin script is present all over Syria and not only understandable for Kurds coming from Turkey, nor was Tell Abyad unilaterally detached from Raqqa Governorate nor was it ever part of the Kobane canton.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Keep all discussions about Tell Abyad at its article talkpage. If there is consensus to remove them, then you can remove them. I just quickly looked at the talkpage now and I don't see any consensus to remove the quotes. The only one who wants to remove them is you and the sockpuppet Konli17. I see support for it to remain in the article. If you see something that you feel should be removed and other people disagree, then edit warring is not the way to remove it. You have removed the quotes like 10 times now. You did not gain consensus to remove the quotes yet you continued to remove them. Paradise Chronicle, its important that you respect the opinions of other editors. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted at the open Kurds and Kurdistan case

In the open Kurds and Kurdistan arbitration case, a number of remedies and finding of facts have been proposed, some of which relate to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Pronouns

GPinkerton has made it clear that they do not like being referred to using feminine pronouns. Please do not continue to do so. SQL^{Query me!} 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Didn't know, thought Gp was a women.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The best advice I can give you - is that if someone hasn't told you how to refer to them on-wiki (some people have this in their userpages, some even in signatures, some have mentioned in places over the years) - it's best to just use neutral pronouns. I apologize for the appearance of a pile-on, by the way. I hadn't seen that L235 had said something on the arbitration case talkpage as well. SQL^{Query me!} 22:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed

An arbitration case regarding Kurds and Kurdistan has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.
• GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Thepharoah17 (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• عمرو بن كلثوم (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Supreme Deliciousness (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Paradise Chronicle is warned to avoid casting aspersions and repeating similar uncollegial conduct in the future.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed

Dreamy Jazz, the tp says "topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed", does this only apply to article edits? So am I still allowed to discuss at talkpages about the topic? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I have referred the matter to arbcom. I should have an answer to you soon. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

WP:ARCA notification

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Kurds and Kurdistan and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, BDD (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

• By the way, this was an entirely acceptable edit under WP:BANEX, though erring on the side of caution in the case of a topic ban is always wise. --BDD (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
• Moved to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Kurds and Kurdistan: topic ban clarification. I apologize for the confusion. --BDD (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

The phrase "articles related to" in the topic bans for GPinkerton, Thepharoah17, عمرو بن كلثوم, and Supreme Deliciousness are struck, to clarify that the bans are not limited to article-space.

For the Arbitration Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan