User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2014/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Supreme Deliciousness. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
barnstar
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| for contributions regarding the Syrian Civil War and related conflicts DocumentError (talk) 05:29, 8 October 2014 (UTC) |
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IP needs blocking. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 06:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
POV tagging against consensus
I remind you that all Syria Civil War articles are under the 1RR sanctions. You reverted my removal of the POV tag on Siege of Kobane. The tag goes against Common Name and the discussion on the talk page you have participated in. I urge you to work toward consensus and not disrupt articles, especially about current events in the news. Thanks. Legacypac (talk) 02:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
You have been reported for edit warring here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Supreme_Deliciousness_reported_by_.5B.5BUser:Template:Legacypac.5D.5D_.28Result:_.29 Legacypac (talk) 17:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Birthright Unplugged
Your edit on Birthright Unplugged has been reverted by me and 2 IP editors. You should know by now that when reverted, you should discuss, rather than insist on your edit. See WP:BRD. In this case, I do understand your point, and I even understand that the issue is politically loaded, but you are overdoing this. Saying that Israel is the ancestral homeland of the Jews is not something that can be reverted, and hammering on a certain amount of proselytes among Jews does not change that, really. Please find yourself some serious issues to tackle. Debresser (talk) 19:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- I have reverted the edit back to Supreme Deliciousness' version ("the Holy Land"). The phrase "ancestral homeland" is not cited in either of the sources. DocumentError (talk) 03:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- That is also not in the article. The source says "homeland". Including the parenthesis. Obviously that means "ancestral homeland". Debresser (talk) 10:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- We do have 2 alternatives. We could write "homeland" including the parenthesis, but I think that is unencyclopedial. Or we could simply write "Israel", but then we would miss the point, which is to explain why a visit to Israel would constitute a "Birthright" for Jews. Debresser (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- "Israel" sounds like a great compromise. Thanks for suggesting it; I'll change it now. DocumentError (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- It is a good idea by way of compromise, but, as I said above, it completely misses the point, and is therefore a bad edit. Nevertheless, to avoid conflict, I am fine with it as well. Debresser (talk) 23:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- "ancestral homeland" could not have stayed, as it is not true. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- We can't compose WP entries using verbiage originating in the mystical prophecies of this religion or that religion. The term "ancestral homeland" was completely unacceptable. It sounds like there's a consensus for "Israel," though, even if it's not the best possible choice. Toda rabah, Debresser! - DocumentError (talk) 01:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- I want to log my disagreement, and I think the term "ancestral homeland" is correct and acceptable. But let's keep the present compromise. Debresser (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Your disagreement is logged. Please see the registrar for a receipt. DocumentError (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- I want to log my disagreement, and I think the term "ancestral homeland" is correct and acceptable. But let's keep the present compromise. Debresser (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- It is a good idea by way of compromise, but, as I said above, it completely misses the point, and is therefore a bad edit. Nevertheless, to avoid conflict, I am fine with it as well. Debresser (talk) 23:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- "Israel" sounds like a great compromise. Thanks for suggesting it; I'll change it now. DocumentError (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
RfC
A RfC in which you may be interested has opened here. DocumentError (talk)
Notice
Dear user:Supreme Deliciousness, i would like to point out that there is a new thread opened at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, filed by myself against you. It is concerning your accusation of me on "INAPPROPRIATE CANVASSING" regarding Syrian Civil War issue - public accusation, which you refuse to remove from talk:Syrian Civil War and i consider it as personal attack, as no proof has yet been provided.GreyShark (dibra) 18:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)