User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2010/April
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Supreme Deliciousness. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
occupied user
You know why many editors see you as a disruptive editor? Because you edit solely to add negative information. You are anti something and not pro anything. IMO, your sole occupation on WP is to attack Israeli articles. If only you could emulate Tiamut and alAmeer son who have matured past attacking Israeli articles and concentrate on improving Palestinian / Arab articles. Until then, we see your reluctance to edit in good faith. --Shuki (talk) 22:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- You are a very disruptive user, going around to all articles and reverting everything I have added, you are re adding Israeli-pov in those article against the majority viewpoint. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- 'I know you are, so what am I'? Come on, need better comebacks! Anyway, step back and you will see that my recent rvs of you are not introducing any Israeli POV at all, so the misleading accusations are just hurting your credibility. I'm just merely reverting your one-sided POV introduction. Take this issue to a central discussion. You can do that right? --Shuki (talk) 22:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Your pov pushing will be reverted. My worldview category's will be re inserted. I have already made posts at the talkpages. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Wonderful prophecy. And do you know why it is undeniable to call your edits 1) disruptive, 2) POV, and 3) bad faith? Because you did not touch anything non-Israeli/Jewish. If you would be sincere about supporting Unomi on this, then you would go all the way and slap the cats on every single Palestinian and Syrian / Golan Heights articles. But you did not and I know that you will not. I'm curious to see what happens if you slap an 'universitys in Israeli-occupied' (per original) cat on the Birzeit University article and other articles. --Shuki (talk) 22:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Your pov pushing will be reverted. My worldview category's will be re inserted. I have already made posts at the talkpages. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- 'I know you are, so what am I'? Come on, need better comebacks! Anyway, step back and you will see that my recent rvs of you are not introducing any Israeli POV at all, so the misleading accusations are just hurting your credibility. I'm just merely reverting your one-sided POV introduction. Take this issue to a central discussion. You can do that right? --Shuki (talk) 22:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
If you wasn't so full of it, then I would maybe listen to the things that you say, but when you call my edits pov while you re insert that the universitys location is Israel [1] then I know very clearly who you are. The meaning was "Israeli university in the Israeli-occupied territories", I will make this clear the next time. And there is no need for any Palestinian equivalence since the category "Universities and colleges in the Palestinian territories" already exists. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- So what is the difference between 'Israeli occupied' and 'Palestinian territories'? WP likes consistency and especially NPOV. Please explain. --Shuki (talk) 23:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
ANI
Hello, I started a discussion with respect to you and others which can be found here: [2] Stellarkid (talk) 05:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
AE
Please see AE discussion here [3] Plot Spoiler (talk) 05:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Templates
If you ever post a template on my talk page again that is intended for new users who are unaware of the rules, I will report you for harassment. Breein1007 (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- You made three reverts in a couple of hours, the warning was warranted. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- WP:DTTR - I'm done wasting my time talking to you here. Do whatever you want. I'm simply making you aware that your actions will have consequences. Cheers, Breein1007 (talk) 23:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- PS: you forgot to warn Unomi who made 3 reverts on the same article. Oops? Breein1007 (talk) 23:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Unomi had opened up a discussion at the talkpage [4] And I know from other articles that he opens up discussions and collaborates with other people, you edit warred inserting something from JVL, without talking at the talkpage, so thats the reason. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Answered your question on my talk page
See you there. Tiamuttalk 13:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Golan Heights Winery for the n+1st time
Hello, with reference to your edits to Golan Heights Winery and others, I strongly urge you not to use terms like "rv censorship" in your edit summaries, since this goes very much against WP:NPA and WP:CIVILITY, among others. You're not exactly a new and inexperienced editor so I'm somewhat surprised that you're up to this type of behaviour towards other editors. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 10:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see how calling it censorship when someone removes the worldview and inserts an extreme minority view is a personal attack or incivility. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Then just take my word for it and see it as friendlyn advice that these are phrases that you should avoid in edit summaries. Tomas e (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Picture of monument for Irguns in userpage
Why didn't you tell me you were discussing it? I would probably have agreed to remove it. How did you notice it suddenly? I just contemplated removing it today while trying to move pictures around my webpage. I only found out about it accidentally - you should have told me. You know I like the picture because I took it, right? I would gladly have removed it, if you just asked me to. LOL. I'm not even an active user. Nice find. Please be WP:CIVIL next time and inform me if you're discussing my pictures or anything concerning me. I'm reporting you for incivility. Amoruso (talk) 06:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Is_it_appropriate_to_report_something_about_a_user_without_informing_him.3F
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Is_it_appropriate_to_report_something_about_a_user_without_informing_him.3F. nsaum75¡שיחת! 06:02, 11 April 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})
Your AE report withdrawal
I have rolled back your deletion of the thread. Please do not delete threads in which others have commented; instead, just note your withdrawal in your section and let an admin close the thread. Thanks, Sandstein 08:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
SPI
I brought your name up along with another's at a sock investigation. It actually didn't even occur to me that you might be checked and only added it for the bureaucracy bit. Breein made it pretty clear that I should have let him know and it wasn;t appreciated so I am giving you a heads up so just so everone is on the same page. Apologies for the hassle. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ani medjool Cptnono (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Golan hills
I think your new article looks good, although somebody should write a sentence or two as a lede.
You might want to mention it at WikiProject Israel and WikiProject Syria and invite interested editors to comment. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that it is developing well. I'll look it over and see if I can come up with some sort of neutral lede. --nsaum75¡שיחת! 04:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- There used to be a way, or a template, to group all the coords in one place, instead of having them splattered like this all over the page. It's an eyesore. Anybody? Yazan (talk) 07:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. You can create the article and the redirects if you'd like, or I can do it instead if that's what you'd prefer. Let me know what you think. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Alex Jones
You need a reliable source that the websites are blocking, Alex's own sites are not reliable for anything other than his redacted opinions. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Israeli companies operating in the occupied territories
I have nominated Category:Israeli companies operating in the occupied territories (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: Translation
Sorry, I don't speak Arabic. ← George talk 23:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Golan hills
Hi. I'll take care of it this evening or over the weekend. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hi SD. In light of the ongoing discussion on the draft's Talk page, I'm going to hold off moving anything until there's something resembling consensus. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
This may be one of the lamest reverts I've ever seen. Please stop making edits whose sole purpose is to politicize articles and Talk pages. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:47, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- I see that you made a similar edit to Talk:Rujm el-Hiri. If you continue to make such edits, I will block you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi
I remove RfC I open so you can open later and redirect article. Ani medjool (talk) 23:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
yes i add it to search now for standardize common arabic name Ani medjool (talk)
yes i doing that now
Yes I did that too Ani medjool (talk) 00:16, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Maybe when you open new RfC on name, order of Arabic and hebrew need be address too? Make simple to combine both issue. Ani medjool (talk)
ok fix. thank you. Ani medjool (talk) 00:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)