User talk:Superkid761
un ban me please i will not vandlise anymore ever
[edit]
Superkid761 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i agree to stop
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲水 12:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock | reason= i'm autistic That is not an excuse. Yunshui 雲水 12:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
please
[edit]Superkid761 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i am not going to vandalize anything if unblocked it's been 1 year i'm 14 now i'm mature enough now also i know i was banned for vandalism but that was a year ago this is now i'm 14 i'm more mature please give me another chanceSuperkid761 (talk) 10:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given your history of vandalism, I'm declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 12:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Superkid761 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i am not going to vandalize anything if unblocked it's been 1 year i'm 14 now i'm mature enough now also i know i was banned for vandalism but that was a year ago this is now i'm 14 i'm more mature i have changed please i can be useful i understand if you say no
Decline reason:
What edits would you make if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please
[edit]
Superkid761 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
reason I am not going to vandalize anything if unblocked it's been 1 year I'm 14, now I'm mature enough now also I know I was banned for vandalism but that was a year ago. This is now I'm 14 I'm more mature I have changed please, I can be useful I understand if you say no I will make constructive edits useful edits that make more sense. The sort of edits you get praise for
Accept reason:
I am willing to give you a chance to prove that you have changed. However, I think it only fair to warn you that I don't have much faith that you will be able to edit effectively. More important to me than the points that Peridon mentions below are the considerable problems you have had with formatting of unblock requests. That is something which quite a lot of editors find confusing at first, but it is unusual to see anyone who keeps on having the same problems time and time again as much as you have. Despite that, I am giving you another chance, but on the understanding that if your editing is not constructive you are likely to be blocked again very soon. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- By not using capitals and punctuation, you aren't giving a good impression of the sort of editing you can do. Please answer the question about what sort of edits you were thinking of making. Saying 'constructive' doesn't really give us much of an idea. Peridon (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello Superkid761! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing!
A word of advice, to help you avoid problems.
[edit]From my experience over the years, I find that new editors are much more likely to have a successful time here if they start with very small edits. To begin with, don't try to do anything big, like re-writing a large section of an article, or creating a whole new article. Just make very small changes, improving a few words here and there. That way, any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't find that you have made a real mess of anything, or that a whole lot of your work is wasted because it's just deleted. You will gradually get to know how editing Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough to be able to make much bigger changes without fear that everything you do will be thrown away. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Superkid761! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 13:25, Friday, February 13, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Question about a strange edit
[edit]What di you mean by this edit? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC) i was doing a responce Superkid761 (talk) 12:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
This Singaporean wants to ask something.
[edit]Hey, Superkid761. What is with the page, User:T0609308B/sandbox? What on earth is a 9-year-old kid doing here? Please stop with your nonsense edit, I beg you. I do not care if you are from St. Hilda Primary School. And please refrain from creating hoax pages. Thanks, from a guy who is 3 years older than you and don't care about the PSLE at all, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 10:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
I didn't create it
[edit]{{reply to Nahnah4} it's not a hoax or a troll it's simply me correcting grammer
- Superkid761, please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). And, obviously, it is not you correcting grammar (spelled wrongly lah). Tell ya first, Firstly, to use the template, use it like this: {{reply to|Nahnah4}}. You put the username after the "|", and I won't mind if I adopt you and teach you on Wiki policies. From a primary school student also, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 10:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
i'm actually 14
[edit]@Nahnah4: i was editing properly a userpage
- If you want to start an article, make sure that he or she is a notable subject. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 10:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- So do you mind if I adopt you? P.S. You don't need to use a new section to reply to other users. Thanks, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 10:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
okay
[edit]@Nahnah4: okay
I am particularly curious about how you encountered User:T0609308B/sandbox, given that the user who created apparently joined Wikipedia earlier today, and has made no other edits outside that sandbox page. Without knowing it was there, finding it would be virtually impossible. What is your relationship to User:T0609308B? Yunshui 雲水 10:43, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
i am not a relation
[edit]@Yunshui: i simply was on recent changes i'm not being disruptive
- Forgive me for saying so, but the act of editing another user's sandbox is in itself pretty suspect - unless you're invited to do so, it isn't something most editors appreciate. I'll chalk this up to inexperience, but please don't edit other users' sandboxes or userpages without their consent in future, whether you spot them on recent changes or not. Yunshui 雲水 11:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
yes
[edit]@Nahnah4: yes please Superkid761 (talk) 13:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Okay! Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Last chance
[edit]This. Just no. I am fairly certain, based on your edits since you were unblocked, that despite your assurances you are still in no way mature enough to edit Wikipedia. I would love you to prove me wrong; if you don't, then I'm afraid you are likely to find yourself sitting on the sidelines for another year or two. We routinely block editors who are not sufficiently competent to edit here, whether they are well-meaning or not; to date, I see nothing that suggests you possess that competence at this point in time. Yunshui 雲水 20:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry i will download the anti vandal program and prove i can be useful also sorry about that
[edit]@Yunshui: sorry direct me to the page full of anti vandal downloads and i shall be able to be useful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superkid761 (talk • contribs)
- I assume that you want to be able to use WP:Twinkle or WP:Huggle or similar? They don't automatically turn you into a good editor, you know. You have to have good judgement, and that's one of the things that we're questioning most when it comes to your edits. Origamiteⓣⓒ 23:23, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- I see that you've enabled Huggle. Please be careful; you are responsible for your edits with the tool. Origamiteⓣⓒ 17:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
@Yunshui: oh come on i just corrected a most of the spelling mistakes on the help desk
Declining GOCE request
[edit]Hi Superkid761. I've asked the other coordinators of the Guild of Copy Editors, and we've agreed that we should decline your request for a copy edit of Calamity Jane. "Needs verification" is something that we can say of gazillions of Wikipedia articles, and Calamity Jane doesn't really need to be given special priority. There's a "needs copy editing" banner on the article already, so it will be copy edited eventually anyway. GOCE requests are mainly for people who have done major work on articles but are worried about the quality of their writing. Best wishes, --Stfg (talk) 10:50, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Adoption talkback(s)
[edit]User:Nahnah4/Adoption/Talkback Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
how answer questions
[edit]@Nahnah4: 1.um you can refer to me as superkid761
2. would you care if I said I was autistic?
3. um since last year I've made some bad mistakes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superkid761 (talk • contribs)
- Hey--I think they mean that you should reply on the adoption page, not here. Also, you might want to read WP:AUTIST. Origamiteⓣⓒ 14:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, Superkid. Got it. From now on, please reply on the adoption page, User:Nahnah4/Adoption/Superkid761. I will take note of your autism. Thanks, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hey, do you still want to be adopted? You haven't edited anything other than your user page in almost two weeks. You should probably talk to Nahnah4. Origamiteⓣⓒ 11:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, Superkid. Got it. From now on, please reply on the adoption page, User:Nahnah4/Adoption/Superkid761. I will take note of your autism. Thanks, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Don't edit other users' comments
[edit]I reverted your edits to WP:HD. I'm sure that you meant them in good faith, but in general you should not edit other users' comments. Please read the guidance at WP:TPO. Some of the errors were obviously typographical errors, but the meaning was obvious. In some cases the phraseology was intentional, including jargon used generally on Wikipedia. In other cases your change may well have changed the message from the original intention, for example, what makes you think that the editor wanted "thirty one" as his new username rather than "thirtyone"? Please be more careful in future. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Moving in the middle of a move discussion
[edit]
It is not OK for you to unilaterally move a page in the middle of a move discussion on the page. See Talk:RB Butcher#Requested move 23 November 2021.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- It's literally been over a month since they changed their name to River, there is no reason to keep delaying the closure of that discussion. Superkid761 (talk) 23:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- It was closed. But a move review judged that the closure was improper and that the discussion should be reopened and relisted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 00:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Given how the first reply to the re-opening of the 'discussion' proved that the move was justified, how much longer will we have to to wait until the discussion is once again closed? Superkid761 (talk) 02:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- It was closed. But a move review judged that the closure was improper and that the discussion should be reopened and relisted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 00:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Swedish non-binary actors
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Swedish non-binary actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 09:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Polish non-binary actors
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Polish non-binary actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 09:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Polish non-binary actors
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Polish non-binary actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)