User talk:SuperBonnyYahya
June 2021
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lady Jane Grey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Nutri Ventures – The Quest for the 7 Kingdoms shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Make sure your changes make grammatical sense. Seddon talk 23:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:SuperBonnyYahya reported by User:FilmandTVFan28 (Result: ). Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
SuperBonnyYahya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry I was edit warring at Nutri Ventures – Quest for the 7 Kingdoms, I actually do care about my mistakes and I am very sorry for socking with 2603:8080:600:3457::/64, It was just I didn't want anything to get in my way of editing, And I am very sorry for adding multiple countries in the lead, I will never make any more disruptive edits or add multiple countries in the lead again, I just don't want to be blocked from editing forever. SuperBonnyYahya (talk) 16:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've been evading your block very recently. Given you have demonstrated, repeatedly, that you cannot be trusted to follow our policies, your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that point, you'll need to be substantially more convincing. Yamla (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
SuperBonnyYahya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I actually learned my lesson, I promise, I literally now understand why I was blocked and I promise never to do it again, so may I please get unblocked now. SuperBonnyYahya (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You can demonstrate that you learned your lesson by doing as requested by Yamla. 331dot (talk) 20:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
January 2022
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.