User talk:Sunlitsky

Some stroopwafels for you!

Great article creation in self-similar solution! Keep it up!
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 00:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Howard Wilson Emmons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morristown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sunlitsky. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of things named after George Gabriel Stokes— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Hello Sunlitsky: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 14:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Correct punctuation

Please look at this edit. Ranges of pages or year or other numbers, or of letters of the alphabet, use an en-dash, not a hyphen. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lamb–Oseen vortex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most viewed videos on Youtube (By Year) IS WRONG

Hello, my name is Rob17p, I was interested in how you organize the page "the most viewed videos on youtube" so strict that anyone cannot edit it. I make this note to inform you that its content in the table "By year of release" has many errors. As a user who can edit the page, I invite you to look for "Videos más vistos en YouTube por año in Spanish and there you will realize how much they lack.

I HOPE you will check it out to make all the changes

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most-viewed YouTube videos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Horse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By realese by year changes

Hello editors, it's me again, I want to tell you that your table of the most viewed videos by year of release has two errors (2021 and 2012), I invite you to check es:Anexo:Videos más vistos en YouTube por año so that you can review it :)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hele-Shaw flow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circulation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ILK Equation

Hi Sunlitsky! Thanks a lot for creating the ILK equation page! I wrote the original Dirac–Kähler equation and I wasn't aware of this earlier work by Ivanenko and Landau. Very glad that you made this edit!! OpenScience709 (talk) 19:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On second though, should this page be titled Ivanenko–Landau–Kähler equation or Dirac–Kähler equation? The former is more comprehensive in terms of who discovered the equation, but the latter seems to be more prevalent in the literature. It's a similarly conundrum as with say the Higgs mechanism, which in principle should rather be called the ABEGHHK'tH mechanism, but that is clearly not the title. What are your thoughts on this? OpenScience709 (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for the creating the original article in the first place. My initial thought was to redirect ILK to DK equation, but I believe its is appropriate to give right credits to the original discoverers. The usage of ILK appears to begin from the 80s in the literature as I think Ivanenko and Landau's work were unknown in the west. In any case, I don't know whether three names is too long; there is also a five name article BBGKY hierarchy. Sunlitsky (talk) 10:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, not sure. It is more satisfying when it's the correct attribution in the title. But, as far as I understand Wikipedia conventions, articles are supposed to reflect the most common name rather than the correct attribution name. Instead the attribution name is important in the first sentence of the introduction, but the title is supposed to be such that the article itself is easiest to find (because if most people google for Dirac–Kähler equation and this see the ILK article, many might be unaware that they are the same thing). This then begs the question of which name is more common? Generally from my experience I saw the "Dirac–Kähler equation" used more (but that is of course a subjective argument); a slightly better argument is that at least a naive arXiv search gives 13 results for "Dirac–Kähler equation" and only two for "Ivanenko–Landau–Kähler equation", seemingly supporting this hypothesis. What are your thoughts on this? OpenScience709 (talk) 18:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with your point. I am still bit leaning to the ILK version; nevertheless, I am good with you either version. Please redirect if you think DK is the right way to go. If you are still unsure, may be start a discussion on the talk page to see what others think? I expect that most will agree with the DK version. Sunlitsky (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  It's probably best to start a discussion since I also see both sides of the argument. I'll do so now :) OpenScience709 (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  
  The move discussion has been closed and the page moved. It is perfectly ok to WP:BOLDly move an article, but please don't cut and paste from one article to another like it was done on 3rd September. See below notice. Vpab15 (talk) 13:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ivanenko–Landau–Kähler equation. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Vpab15 (talk) 13:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. Sunlitsky (talk) 16:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tsutomu Kambe

The article Tsutomu Kambe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and does not appear to meet WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AHIJACK

Hello, I suppose this edit was an accident. Both are completely different persons. The accounts who hijacked the article were blocked as WP:SOCK and one of them has a history of leaving unrelated edit summaries like this. Please see WP:AHIJACK. Best regards - SUN EYE 1 08:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it.Sunlitsky (talk) 08:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sathyaprakash Dharmar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sathyaprakash Dharmar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sathyaprakash Dharmar

Hello, Sunlitsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sathyaprakash Dharmar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sunlitsky. Thank you for your work on Janzen–Rayleigh expansion. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:. Thanks.Sunlitsky (talk) 08:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sunlitsky. Thank you for your work on Michelson–Sivashinsky equation. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sunlitsky. Thank you for your work on Entropy-vorticity wave. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I think the page could do with restructuring so it is more "gentle", more understandable by a novice. There are also some form aspects which should be edited, for instance "well-known" in the lead, use of "we" in the derivation. An image would be very good.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 00:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sunlitsky. Thank you for your work on Q tensor. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sunlitsky. Thank you for your work on Landau–Peierls instability. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I think it would be better to have a gentler lede for novices.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 00:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Becker–Morduchow–Libby solution

Hello, Sunlitsky,

Thank you for creating Becker–Morduchow–Libby solution.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a paragraph to the lead to help, for instance, a high school student understand the context.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sunlitsky. Thank you for your work on Erdogan–Chatwin equation. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

The term Erdogan–Chatwin equation does not show up that much, sometimes it is Erdogan & Chatwin, sometimes it is their calculation or method.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]