User talk:Summittechgroup

This is Summittechgroup's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Summit Technology Group (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Summit Technology Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 23:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Summittechgroup! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 23:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Group accounts are not permitted. Cullen328 (talk) 00:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cullen328,

I noticed that the account associated with "Summittechgroup" has been blocked for promotional edits and the use of a promotional username. I understand the reasoning behind the block and apologize for any misunderstandings or violations of the guidelines.

Moving forward, I am committed to making non-promotional contributions and will ensure that my edits adhere to the community standards. If the username is deemed inappropriate, I am willing to change it to something more neutral.

I would greatly appreciate your consideration of my request for an unblock, and I will be sure to avoid any similar issues in the future.

Thank you for your time and understanding.

Best regards Summittechgroup (talk) 13:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Summittechgroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

SummitTechEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous contributions violated Wikipedia’s guidelines as they appeared promotional. I now realize that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for business promotion, and I sincerely apologize. Moving forward, I will focus on making neutral, well-sourced contributions, particularly on topics related to broadcasting technology and engineering, without any promotional intent. I will also ensure that I comply with Wikipedia’s policies regarding paid contributions. My goal is to contribute to the platform’s value by improving article quality and neutrality.

Decline reason:

That username would still violate WP:USERNAME. You haven't addressed your violation of WP:COI, nor have you explained how you'd edit appropriately in that subject area, given your inappropriate edits up to this point. Yamla (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Summittechgroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PaulStewartContributor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous contributions violated Wikipedia’s guidelines as they appeared promotional. I now realize that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for business promotion, and I sincerely apologize. Moving forward, I will focus on making neutral, well-sourced contributions, particularly on topics related to broadcasting technology and engineering, without any promotional intent. I will also ensure that I comply with Wikipedia’s policies regarding paid contributions. My goal is to contribute to the platform’s value by improving article quality and neutrality.

Decline reason:

Your proposed username looks okay. You haven't addressed your violation of WP:COI, nor have you explained how you'd edit appropriately in that subject area, given your inappropriate edits up to this point. PhilKnight (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summittechgroup (talk) 12:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Summittechgroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PaulStewartContributor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous contributions violated Wikipedia’s guidelines as they appeared promotional. I now realize that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for business promotion, and I sincerely apologize. Moving forward, I will focus on making neutral, well-sourced contributions, particularly on topics related to broadcasting technology and engineering, without any promotional intent. I will also ensure that I comply with Wikipedia’s policies regarding paid contributions. My goal is to contribute to the platform’s value by improving article quality and neutrality

Decline reason:

Decline duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summittechgroup (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that this request is a duplicate of one already submitted. To avoid confusion and streamline the process, please refer to the original request for further discussion and updates. Let’s continue the conversation there to ensure everything is addressed properly. Thank you! Summittechgroup (talk) 16:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that this request is a duplicate of one already submitted. To avoid confusion and streamline the process, please refer to the original request for further discussion and updates. Let’s continue the conversation there to ensure everything is addressed properly. Thank you! 38.137.51.179 (talk) 04:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @PhilKnight please refer to the original request for further discussion and updates. Let’s continue the conversation there to ensure everything is addressed properly. Summittechgroup (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that you have permanently and irrevocably released your logo free for anyone (even competitors) to use, subject only to the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. This may not have been your intention. --Yamla (talk) 12:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]