User talk:Summerdays1

Welcome!

Hello, Summerdays1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Johnny Grey did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome. Tacyarg (talk) 07:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your note about Johnny Grey. This article currently reads so promotional to me that I am afraid I wouldn't know where to start with improving it, so have tagged as advert and left it for others to pick up. It looks as if other editors have thought that there is a history of paid contributions. Best wishes if you do decide to work on it; the Teahouse is a useful resource if you need guidance. Tacyarg (talk) 10:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Kristyn Getty have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 08:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message. I don't think there is any reason to have those external links to sites like store.gettymusic.com in the Kristyn Getty article, as they are promotional, but you are welcome to start a discussion on the article's Talk page, or to ask for advice at somewhere like the WP:TEAHOUSE. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 13:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not sure what you mean about suggest bot links, I'm afraid. About my userpage - the relevant policy about content is at WP:USERPAGE. I don't think I'm in violation of this, but please do flag it up on one of the admin noticeboards if you disagree. Tacyarg (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Albini and overlinking

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I was just reviewing your edits to the Steve Albini article. I'm not reverting, as some of the copy-editing seems to improve readability. However, I'd suggest reviewing WP:overlink, as you've added a number of unnecessary wikilinks. Things that everyone understands do not need to be linked, especially in articles not germane to the subject. Because an article exists is usually not a reason to link to it. Most everyone reading the article knows about Chicago, Seattle, etc. without adding links that don't really explain anything about Albini. Again, welcome and I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. CAVincent (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2023(UTC)

Please stop using vague, misleading edit summaries

Please stop using vague, misleading edit summaries e.g., "education centers" in this edit that added a date to the enrollment of the university, "curriculum" in this edit that just made minor copy edits throughout the article (including the introduction of a typo). If you're just making minor copy edits in one section or throughout an article, it's okay to say that in an edit summary - that's helpful for other editors. ElKevbo (talk) 12:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Banned from my talk page

You don't seem to listen to others here, so I'm posting here for more visibility: you are banned from my talk page, and from pinging me by username for anything but required admin notices. Chiselinccc (talk) 16:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are blocked indefinitely due to the community consensus at WP:ANI. Cullen328 (talk) 18:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 18:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]