User talk:Sumeet 92

Hello, Sumeet 92! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of The X Factor finalists (UK series 5) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mod.^torrentrealm 12:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Vickers

Do not undo me without comment, I am not a vandal. If you believe that Vickers is notable, please provide some sources other than her Twitter profile that discuss this album she is working on, or her record deal. See our guidelines on reliable sources for more information. J Milburn (talk) 12:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be aware of the three revert rule. Please take this to the talk page. J Milburn (talk) 12:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Smjg (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Smjg (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reported. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 15:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, marking this edit as "minor" when the edit served to replace a redirect with a previously deleted article is just a tiny bit dishonest. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 15:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, one of your edit summaries asked why the article has been "deleted". If you read this discussion, it was decided that the article should be redirected. I hope this makes sense and please stop reverting it. Jozal ^(talk) 15:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Diana Vickers. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OtisJimmyOne 15:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it get deleted ? See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Vickers. But I think the Afd is out of date, but no-one will discuss it. I also think they are biting you. As I have said, this should be discussed and so I have opened a deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Active discussions. --Triwbe (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Get over to Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_June_9 and comment on the Diana Vickers deletion review. Get things moving correctly. --Triwbe (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 18:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Diana-Vickers-wikipedia.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Diana-Vickers-wikipedia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DianaVickersAlternativeCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DianaVickersAlternativeCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DianaVickersOnceSingle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DianaVickersOnceSingle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheBoyWhoMurderedLoveCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheBoyWhoMurderedLoveCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Songs From The Tainted Cherry Tree Wikipedia-Diana-Vickers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Songs From The Tainted Cherry Tree Wikipedia-Diana-Vickers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]