User talk:Sultan1970

Welcome!

Hello, Sultan1970, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Sultan Tarlacı, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dan D. Ric (talk) 09:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sultan Tarlacı

A tag has been placed on Sultan Tarlacı requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan D. Ric (talk) 09:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NeuroQuantology Journal and My Biography

I was add interdsiciplinary neuroquantology journal to the wikipedia and my biography. But you can delete my biography and journal content. I dont understand what you need? What is the your critism for add for new entry.

It isn't appropriate to create an article about yourself, since it's nearly impossible to write in a neutral way about yourself. If you are truly notable, other people will write about your importance. What Wikipedia is not might be interesting for you to read. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am replying to your comment above and the similar one you left on my talk page. Firstly, I did not propose the article Neuroquantology for deletion, that was done by another editor, though I do have doubts about the notability or lack of of your journal.

I did propose your autobiography for speedy deletion and it was deleted because it was nearly word for word copied from this web page. However, even if it was a completely original article, it still would probably not pass the notability criterion. For example, a google search for Sultan Tarlaci yields less than 2,500 results. A google search on the name of the MD I work most closely with, who is just a family practice MD, nothing special, yields more than 29,000, and a search on another MD I work with has over 1,000,000. My own real name (Which is not Dan D Ric) yields 14,700, 4 of the first 10 of which are indeed about me, yet I don't consider myself notable enough to pass wp:notability.

Before further editing, you should consider reading the Wikipedia pages on: confict of interest and autobiography, as well as the pages suggested in the Welcome! section above. Dan D. Ric (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing copyright issues

The article Sultan Tarlacı began in its first incarnation as a copy of [1], and I'm afraid it remains an unusable unauthorized derivative work of that source. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:

Sultan Tarlacı was born in Rize, Turkey in 1970. He finished medical school in 1995 and specialized in neurology in 2000. He was awarded a Research Encouragement Award by the Society of Brain Research in 2000, a Research Encouragement Award by TUBITAK Society of Brain Research in 2001, and the Sedat Simavi Health Sciences Award by the Society of Turkish Journalists in 2003.

The source says:

Dr. Tarlacı is born in Rize, in 1970. He finished medical school in 1995 and specialized in neurology in 2000. He is awarded Research Encouragement Award by the Society of Brain Research in 2000, Research Encouragement Award by TUBITAK Society of Brain Research in 2001 and Sedat Simavi Health Sciences Award by the Society of Turkish Journalists in 2003.

There are other passages that similarly follow too closely. Overall, the article seems to be reproduced from that source with minimal alteration.

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this article should be rewritten in the temporary space that is now linked from the article's front. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be public domain or permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution.

Please let me know at my talk page if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]