User talk:Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu

Welcome!

Hello, Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! – Ammarpad (talk) 11:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Former

Please, stop adding "Former" to the title of past governors and ministers. Thank you. AbdulOlu (talk) 02:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Thanks You Very Much Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu (talk) 09:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More

I've seen your message, will reply tomorrow Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

okay sir Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Not reasons for deletion, but your article title was wrong, should be Nelson Aluya (not Dr Nelson aluya), no title, both names beginning with capitalised letters, and external links should have a link to his main site, not everything you can find.

You said we are kindly requesting.... Who is "we"? You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends, colleagues or relatives and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line, so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

Much of your text was unsourced, and can't be accepted, that includes all his supposed honours, memberships and personal background. You did have 12 supposed refs, but most were to sites he is associated with, not independent third-party sources. Also, refs should confirm what you have written, not just be random links. For example, of your first five refs, four were to organisations he is connected with, but, more importantly, none even mentioned him, let alone confirmed what you had claimed.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Obvious unsourced promo includes extensive broad-based training and clinical expertise in over three continents... his expertise and selfless service...He continues to dedicate his utmost effort... He is helping to build the framework to recognize... he has championed on a global scale... He refers to himself as a medical advocate.

You have lists of supposed awards, none with wikilinks to the award or a reference to the awarding body to confirm the award

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.

As I said above, external links shouldn't be a dumping ground either.

You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

My attention was drawn my the very odd layout of your text, and the paucity of wikilinks and proper refs. Much of your text is a close paraphrase of (at least) this page, clearly tagged Copyright 2023. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All the corrections and observations have been taken. thank you for the guidance. Everything will be put according to the guidelines. Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu (talk) 10:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Nelson Aluya, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Wikishovel (talk) 09:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

greetings,

I was not paid to edit this, nor i was impressed by the person's identity; i edited because of the notability and the fact that his expertise deserves to be in Wikipedia, and of which the evidence, i provided in reference. i therefore, ask humbly that the page be brought back. thank you for understanding. Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nelson Aluya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nelson Aluya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Maliner (talk) 09:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i believe you about what you said. i am kindly requesting that you give the opportunity to include the subject matter of the page; why the writing about the person concerned. thank you. best regards. Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu (talk) 14:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 10:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 14:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sulaiman Ahmad Muazu (talk) 12:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]