User talk:Sukhleenkoyr

Hi.

Thank you for your Abdus-Samad Khan article. However, it's extremely short, and in addition, has no references. Quote from the message I put on it...

"All biographies of living people created after March 2010 must have at least one reference to a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article. If no reliable references are found and added within a seven-day grace period, this article may be deleted."

To prevent the page from being deleted, can you post some references for Abdus-Samad? Thank you. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 03:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abdus-Samad Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abdus-Samad Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Second Battle of Anandpur, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kashish Arora (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

kashish sir i have a written source which tells that Sikhs capitulated after an assurance of safe passage .Reply soon Sukhleenkoyr (talk) 09:30, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sukhleenkoyr: I have been informed that this is a sock puppet account. I reported it using STiki. This final warning may have come as an outcome of the warnings you have deleted and the fact that you have been blocked from other accounts. In the edit, you broke a reference, changed the whole result where there are two different beliefs of you and the one mentioned. Please mention the source. It is unclear until you do it. You removed the only reference present there and did not provide a reference of yours to support it. Then and only then, after mentioning a reliable source, should you stand against the information written there. Thank you for your contribution.--Kashish Arora (talk) 10:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1.^ a b Jacques, Tony. Dictionary of Battles and Sieges. Greenwood Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-313-33536-5. 2.^ a b Jacques, p.

plz open this and check yourself the details of the battle thank you and namastey Sukhleenkoyr (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sukhleenkoyr. You have new messages at Kashish Arora's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unblock

Use Template:Unblock as in {{Unblock|your reason here}}. Then administrators can see it. RedPanda25 21:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]